[QUOTE="Hater3000"]

Yeah just wait a little longer...:roll:.

The question is When?,WHEN?!!.No really When?,When are the devs going to do something that uses all the Ps3 powar?.

It seems all these days is multi-platform,port or TBA.

Another sad thing is that Devs rather develop for the Wii,Is cheaper and you see the money faster without putting a lot of effort on it.

The Ps3 has the capacity for a true Game masterpiece but Devs rather develop multi-platform crap,ports,rehashes or half baked games.

Sully28

lol your joking me right? We have those games comming, they are in development and we've seen proof they exist. You speak as if we've never seen proof of a great looking game running on the ps3/ made for the ps3. Gears didnt get a game that stunned people/ took advantage of the 360's power untill almost a year later, that game was gears. The ps3 will get one sooner, hell it will get 2 sooner. Lair and warhawk.

Please just don't hit the submit button until you reread your statement, because its just as redundant as this thread.

[QUOTE="OhSnapitz"][QUOTE="cmpepper23"][QUOTE="OhSnapitz"]

[QUOTE="GarchomPro"]Yeh but we got

Free Online
60 gig Harddrive
Wifi Built in
HDMI
Blu-ray Player


You guys for 450 get

1 Year XBL
20gigcmpepper23

So why not add in the cost of bluray movies to the PS3's overall cost then? You'll most likely spend more money on Bluray movies than the average lemming spends on Live..

Because we can rent them for really cheap at Blockbuster....ugh BURN.

Lemmings can buy HD movies on Live without a gold account... :|

WTF is a lemming? Quit it with the DUMBA** talk. 360 users have to pay $60 to get the account. I don't. I just go to Blockbuster. Honestly, I could care less because now that I have my PS3, everyday when I have to take a SH*T, I do it on my 360. I will do this for a year because that is how long Microsoft sh*t on me when I actually payed $50 for XBL. ugh....BURN!

I got into an argument with a lemming a while back and I stated that you get more bang for your buck with the PS3. You get a bigger hardrive, wi fi, and the Blu Ray Drive. In order to have the same capabilties of the PS3, you're going to pay more for your 360.The lemming says, "We have options, M$ didn't force the Blu Ray Drive on us! HA!" Ya, but still doesn't mean you're getting a better buy with the 360.

Now, I'm thinking, since M$ gives you options, why do I HAVE to pay $50+ to play an online match of Halo 2 or 3 or Gears of War when I can play online matches with Resistance and Socom on the PS3 for FREE? It has voice chat and friend lists as well. I don't care for the demos, downloadble movies and XLBA games that I stil have to pay for. I just want to frag some n4bz online. Where are "teh options"?!

majadamus

Why Can't Microsoft just lemme play the games and get demos online for free (like PSN) and make me pay for that extra junk if I wanted it. That's what I want.MikeE21286

[QUOTE="wavebrid"]

[QUOTE="l1mIt"]because u pay for it? :roll: what are your reasons to justify throwing money down the drainl1mIt

and who justify buying a 600 console :?

compare to a 400 one... were you save 200

480$ for the elite milked version. + tax = 500$... 100$less than PS3

oh and 5years of XBL = 250$

hddvd 200$

wireless network adapter 100$

chargekit 30$

so thats what? 1080$ to compare it to what the PS3 has for 600$

[QUOTE="Riki101"][QUOTE="TyrantDragon55"]

[QUOTE="caseypayne69"]Paying for something adds invisible value that xbox owns think they are getting. When ina year PSN will have similiar options for free.fuzzysquash

And by the time that happens, who's to say Live will not have expanded it's features as well?

exactly

question is, what will be Microsoft's answer to Home?

You can send messages to people playing games and they will see them. But until its updated, you have to leave the game to read it. But things like this, I'm sure will be fixed over time.caseypayne69

[QUOTE="farhan007"][QUOTE="cobrax25"]

http://www.ehpdesigns.com/News/print/sid=32.html

"
Of the 76 million video chips expected to be sold by the end of 2007, only about 16 million will be DX10 compatible, according to Dean McCarron, principle analyst at Mercury Research. Yet DX10 chips should account for about half of $2.2 billion graphics chip market this year, added McCarron, whose figures don't reflect the massive integrated graphics chip market."

cobrax25

According to the that source its half of the video card market... yet according to my calculations its more that 100% of the market???? Someone is making a mistake here

The numbers you gave include only software, not hardware.

[QUOTE="farhan007"][QUOTE="cobrax25"]

http://www.ehpdesigns.com/News/print/sid=32.html

"
Of the 76 million video chips expected to be sold by the end of 2007, only about 16 million will be DX10 compatible, according to Dean McCarron, principle analyst at Mercury Research. Yet DX10 chips should account for about half of $2.2 billion graphics chip market this year, added McCarron, whose figures don't reflect the massive integrated graphics chip market."

cobrax25

According to the that source its half of the video card market... yet according to my calculations its more that 100% of the market???? Someone is making a mistake here

The numbers you gave include only software, not hardware.

[QUOTE="farhan007"][QUOTE="cobrax25"]

http://www.ehpdesigns.com/News/print/sid=32.html

"
Of the 76 million video chips expected to be sold by the end of 2007, only about 16 million will be DX10 compatible, according to Dean McCarron, principle analyst at Mercury Research. Yet DX10 chips should account for about half of $2.2 billion graphics chip market this year, added McCarron, whose figures don't reflect the massive integrated graphics chip market."

cobrax25

According to the that source its half of the video card market... yet according to my calculations its more that 100% of the market???? Someone is making a mistake here

The numbers you gave include only software, not hardware.

umm i was soly going off your numbers you provided off of that source.... that source said 2.2 billion and half of it will be directx 10... at the same time they say 16 million sold, yet 16 million x 300(average price of dx 10 card) = 4.8 billion... See the contridiction?

http://www.ehpdesigns.com/News/print/sid=32.html

"
Of the 76 million video chips expected to be sold by the end of 2007, only about 16 million will be DX10 compatible, according to Dean McCarron, principle analyst at Mercury Research. Yet DX10 chips should account for about half of $2.2 billion graphics chip market this year, added McCarron, whose figures don't reflect the massive integrated graphics chip market."

cobrax25

According to the that source its half of the video card market... yet according to my calculations its more that 100% of the market???? Someone is making a mistake here

http://www.smartcomputing.com/editorial/article.asp?article=articles/archive/g0810/005g10/05g10.asp

"Console games accounted for $4.2 billion in sales, and PC games grossed $1.9 billion. ?