Now look at the Wii U, you find it somehow not innovative. It is your op and I won't deny it. But comparing it to PS and Xb, it is then the most developed.system since it combine the advantages of the predecessors and whatever these two do has nothing to concern me anymore because they will always be the followers and copycats. The PS Vita is the cheapest move I have ever seen. If you have seen the footage when it is still called the NGP, Sony stuck a touch pad at the back of it and a slide touch screen. The thing that Sony tried to do is just to make a "Stylish" handheld, rather than an innovative one.
For those who are bashing Wii U. Let me correct things. Nintendo is not suitable with the title "innovator". However, they are fit enough to be called "pioneer". They always look for ideas which is "new" and"beyond every expectation", everything that they did just proves it. Hence, they did, do and will never rely on things that keep changing as "graphics" or "hardware" to keep their customers, as Sony or Microsoft did; please don't give that to my admiring Nintendo. More than that, they dare to take the risk of "everything or nothing" and change it to their advantages. Therefore, no surprise they won over the two competitors. They won thanks to their efforts of breaking the limitations, not by developing old stuff from good to better, such as releasing a HD version of its system with little change and some blockbuster games. the fact that many 3rd party devs do not want to make games for Wii, IMO, has something to do with Miyamoto. He has such a great influence in the game industry that only some people may be worth being his rival. Developers just don't want to admit that they are polishing the gem that Miyamoto has dug up. They don't want to go on the same boat with a living legacy. No game has ever beaten Miyamoto's ones on their battlefront and the pure fact that most Nintendo games sell better than 3rd party ones just prove it.
firstlegionary's comments