To be honest, you really can't asses a game's difficulty by a "game journalist". When we speak strictly (if you want lol) of skill level, most journalists suck at playing games. Hell, some reviewers downright underscore a game for not knowing how to play it right (*cough* Skyward Sword *cough*).

So, really, this article is nothing to base on. I only played Enemy Within, and Classic difficulty wasn't tough. Just needed to get past the learning curve.

@louixiii: Well, Harada explicitly said that this sequel would be the end of the Mishima saga, which spanned from the first game. So it's the finale of the main story. Doesn't mean that this is the final game, it just means that any sequel beyond this one is likely to have a new story.

@angrycreep: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKh2iHoWKcA

Good representation of how Tekken x Street Fighter would be, but seriously BAD choice to incorporate Akuma into Tekken's storyline finale.

Never heard of it until now. What's with Insomniac these days? They're barely coming up with anything worth noticing.

I'm legitimately surprised a game made by Insomniac flied off my radar..

@lnception: Ohh, then in this case it is too short to play. Thanks for clearing up the confusion! :-)

8 hours on the game? Anybody feels like that is too short to weigh in a score that decides an entire game?

I always thought reviewers learned the ins and the outs of the game, then gave a complete evaluation.

Most modern games at least finish at around 20+ hours-ish, and that's just finishing the main parts. Is 8 hours of gameplay really enough to review an entire game, or is Rainbow Six Siege in this particular case too short to play?

Good call, the West are just itching for games like this to rip to shreds.

They've saved themselves some trouble.

Great news! Will give me a reason to get back to my Vita, and should keep me playing for a long while.

Portable strategy games are the next greatest things to strategy games played on a dedicated PC.