[QUOTE="bobaban"]This is only showing your ignorance. MVC2 had a big roster because they used all the previous sprites from the other vs games. This time all the characters are built from the ground up. Conjuration

Alright, so by that way of thinking it would have been alright for GT5 to have 40% less cars than GT4.
Lame excuse.

I still find it hilarious that 3D Realms used 12 years on the game only to be closed down, then in swoops Gearbox and potentially finish it in two, maybe tree, years.Treflis

[QUOTE="MondeEdlu"]

Theres this misconception about pc games looking way better.

From a technical standpoint they will look sharper, wall tiles and whatever other doodads have a little bit more detail but honestly for all intents and purposes they look the exact same during actual gameplay.

We pay for this technicality via needing machines with 4 times the specs of consoles and major delays in most multi-platform releases.

Most games dont even bother remaking the main menu for mouse support, did u really think theyd make extra graphics for pc?

GeneralShowzer

It was a cheap port, and it sold bad, they didn't even want to make Dead Space II on PC. Just be happy that it is on PC, with the lack of interest in the first game.

And i disagree, resolution does make a lot of difference, console games can be rather unplayable, it's not nearly the same. You don't want to pay for it, you don't have to.

People like you just want to complain about everything. You say MOST games are delayed, while it's only the AC series really, with Ubisoft and their idiotic ways.

You don't want to play on PC, you don't have to, if your only interest is in multi-plats just get a console and stop spreading negativity and misinformation on the forum.

[QUOTE="fm_coyote"][QUOTE="DanielDust"]

Same as BC 2, yet here we are.

Getting special treatment sounds like a console port that we shouldn't be worried about and that is bad, because lately when DICE wants to prove something, it's the other way around, so we should be worried.

DanielDust

In the end we got a broken server browser, almost half the time it has lag, controls are meh (the ones saying BF 2 sucks, you might want to play it again, maybe you'll remember how it plays, if not your problem, I like the way it controls better), floaty movement that's specific for consoles since it makes the whole movement look and feel better on a gamepad, free maps that were missing content and it only took the 1 year and lots of advertising and trailers for this existing maps and finally they gave us several free maps.

That was after they announced the game and gave us quite a lot of info on it, if they already started with BF 3, then something is wrong.

Same as BC 2, yet here we are.

Getting special treatment sounds like a console port that we shouldn't be worried about and that is bad, because lately when DICE wants to prove something, it's the other way around, so we should be worried.

DanielDust