Wow this review by and large was pretty pathetic, given the reviewer and the many MANY inconsistancies this site has been having for a good while that doesn't really come as a surprise though.

Being different from the heard is one thing, being inconsistant is another, it makes it pretty much impossible to tell these days if it's even worth picking up a game because it may beextremely overrated (AC) or slightly underrated (Halo Wars)

yeah so i'm relatively familar with what to look for in a HD TV, i've had mine for a while now and i got it when plasma's were the unquestioned rulers of TV land, however i'm looking at getting a new HD TV, going with around 42 inches and i'd like it to be outputting at least 720p resolution, happy not having it any higher than that

Now comes the question, which would be better, LCD or Plasma? i want it simply for gaming

Fallout will destroy fable,

(fable is crap)

so from what i can gather:

10=8

which of course it doesn't you silly silly person

[QUOTE="game_fanatic"]yeah looks good, but it's still gears 1.5, but then again i'm not really to sure that they need to change very much, merely add and tweak some things (gameplay wise). Looks like it will be a solid purchase.jeezers

Why do people keep saying this crap.. gears 1.5 , please explain how, with all the new maps,updated lighting physics,destructible buildings,weapon specific fatalities,new guns,enemies,bosses,all the new gametype modes"meat flag hellz ya" and an expanded campain from 6-8 hours, to 13-15 hours. Please stop acting like gears is anything less than a good sequal.

i'm guessing english isn't your first language here:

"Looks like it will be a solid purchase"

it will be a good sequel, it just isn't really jumping out as a "new" game, there are some nice multiplayer additions, the new weapons are something any game would be expected to have, other than that i don't really think it will be a whole lot different from the first gears. Lucky the first gears was pretty good :D