J-A-B, thanks :) . I never knew snake was controlling the MK2 with the PS3 controller. Luckily I have it saved. Will go and check, also gotta see sunny unpacking the PS3 which I also missed.

@amulbocus: HL2 was ported from the 360 to the ps3 by EA not by valve and they did a poor job. That is true, but it is not all EA's fault either. Theres a link on n4g.com that says Valve intentionally botched the game, which is why they were deleting a bunch of negatives they said of the ps3, the article claims it was a cover up. From screenshots both platforms look same, until you see the orange box (all 5 games) in motion on the PS3, hmmm wonder what caused that. @683017, lol, Please by all means stick with playing games :). 332 million transistors is half the truth, when one considers the daughter die and its limitations.

Dr.Yassam said """For example, Resistance on the PS3 was as good as the devs could make it at THAT time, hence they pushed the PS3 to it's absolute limit too, but Resistance 2 will go further thanks to knowledge and experience gained from their first game leading to improvements in the game engine for the next game.""" Maybe I missed something there buddy but do you have a link about insomniac pushing the PS3 to its limits. Would be an intersting read me thinks. As for those who say 360 can not do MGS4 you are wrong. Any platform can do MGS4 it just wouldn't be the same game.

My opinion and I think you could agree Dr.Yassam is that oblivion from a graphical perspective just plain sucks. I hope they could make the game better on 360 and the PC. Can't wait till Bioshock comes out for the PS3 though, heard the PS3 version looks exactly the same, hopefully the devs will make the game look better on the PS3. Hope I get to see that game on the next comparison.

Most can agree that 360 wins this round.... barely. I did get my copy of MGS 4 today and.....it blew my mind. Never have I seen a game so beautiful with a hell of a story to complement the graphics. The best yet on a conole I have seen, even better than uncharted. I want to see this game on the 360 because I have yet to see a 360 game even match uncharted, yet. Personally I don't think the 360 will ever get a game more visually impressive than Gears 2, and even then is barely an improvement from the first. Like I said 360 barely wins this round no if ands or buts about it, and like I also said I have never seen a game on the 360 match the two games I mentioned.

O.k gamecubepad and Djc, fair enough you have provided proof from a forum, yes I know a forum, LOL. I know its a developer website, but the dude who made those AA claims is obviously a fanboy and its a forum for pete sakes. Anyway there are other articles out there written by devs that say PS3 is better at AA. I am to lazy to look it up because I am done with comparing schemes even though gamespot said themselves in this very article that PS3 has better AA. I know off the top of my head that the developer who is making the ghostbuster game was one of the devs who said PS3 was better at AA. Go look it up if you want to. Also read why the review here at gamespot (Ninja gaiden 2) is not being written: http://www.n4g.com/gaming/News-150915.aspx. Oh and it was """"microsoft""" who said ana was the scaling chip, I was mearly adding that in because it was used against the PS3 in the last comparison. Thanks for the info though, I appreciate it. Anyway cheers to the both of you, and when the next round comes about I hope to see the both of you on here. P.S I am sorry I said the wii sucks, and it didn't have anything to do with the the comparison, I was tired when I wrote that, my bad.

muzza93, are you serious dude. At 1080p the ps3 would get destroyed in a gaphics comparsion. The ANA scaling would out do the ps3 in 1080p, unless the game was designed for 1080p, which in most cases is not.

wow, just wow. For one thing the PS3 is not quite the powerful all mind blowing machine that fanboys make it out to be, at least not yet. When game engines come around that are designed to heavily stream we will start to notice a big difference in one of the consoles, not a little but a big difference. Remember when the 10 mb of edram was the reason why 360 games would always be better anti aliased with no hit for the 360 gpu. I remember fanboys saying that and also saying the ps3 would never AA as good as the 360. What happened? Well they were all given a bunch of garbage and useless info about why the 360 would be more powerful, and guess what. The PS3 now has better AA. It won't be long and magically the PS3 will have better textures. WHy is this do, it can't be. Because all the x360 boys got lied too, thats why. Go read your precious specs about the unified 48 pipelines and remeber to divide all of them up evenly and see what you get. Also note the old spec of the 360 can do 500 million triangles and the PS3 can only do 250 million. Lies all lies. Why? because if you made a game with 500 million triangles you would use up all 48 pipelines, and your game would look nothing more but 500 million triangles with no color, no textures no nothin. So go ahead beleive what you wanna beleive, just remember I'll be back the next comparison and we can discuss it. However I find it odd that the wii really sucks, just my opinion so no haters please.

tttttank Wrote: yes these screens arnt the best, all i KNOW is 360 is better at bumpmapping , and ps3 is clearer 360 might be better at bump mapping because I do not know this for a fact but still they are passing off the 360 shots as well 360 shots when they are actaully ps3 shots. I always taken it for granted and never did any questioning until this go around and I am sorry I did because I am a man that likes facts to be true and in this case they are not. This is a lie about the PS3 at least the assasins creed is, don't know about the other because I do not have the games, except for call of duty 4.

not sure about this graphics comparsion? I questioned the assasins creed because I do not remember it being so cloudy, so I took it upon myself to put the game in, and unfortunately that long download to the harddrive. The first 3 pics are at the very beggining of the game right after the long video and the long tutorial that they make you do. From what I saw is that this graphics comparison is complete BS. Playstation 3 textures looked just as good as what they were showing on the 360. I always wanted to do this because I thought the fanboys were lying about the PS3 games look better than the shots and they look par for par with what they are trying to pass off as the 360 shots. Man I can't believe this, why gamespot, why?