@mogan: are you even reading the comments?? that (ignoring the poorly done job) the score dont reflect the review it self.

so he can go an make its a 1/10 cause he feels like it?? do nobody review this things before they go live??

so you pick any random person in the team, without any oversight, on a random assigned numerical value, and you think that pass as acceptable??

ever heard "The Right Tool for the Right Job", Gamespot is not a 1 man show, im sure you have enough people to be able to give certain one specific genres they are good at.

@Barighm: both are games of repetition. souls because 1 single boss will kill you countless times till you learn its pattern, etc etc etc till you finally beat the boss.

W101 cause you can beat the boss (dying keeps their health were it was so there is no way to NOT beat a boss by force). then as the game progress you learn new tricks, get new heroes, buy more upgrades, and so you revisit the past boss improves your time and how to deal with em.

the game is not broken cause the combat system does with it supposes to do. its just that the learn curve is step as hell.
thats not a bad thing, simple means is not for everyone

@Amanojaku8: oh yeah, sure, lets send someone that mexican food to a mexican restaurant and ask whats his opinion of the food then.

Im sure his opinion will surely be trustworthy about where I should spend my money.

>.>

again if deflection is that :well is his opinion. then why even bother to make a review that lacks any semblance of professionalism. have a hobo or a random pick up stranger do it then.

@Bread_or_Decide:here? for clicks (and bonuses for certain publishers)

@Bread_or_Decide: "Those who want to play one game a hundred times to have fun playing it, I don't think that's many people."

*clears throat*
SOULS. GAMES. EXIST.

end of my counter argument

@mogan: so you are saying that there is no standard what so ever for the review and that the final score are also any random assigned number??

if thats the case. do the world a favor an next time hire a homeless person to make the reviews, they can use the money a little more than any of your writer and have the same validity

@Bread_or_Decide:well, 10-20 minutes is dont even quality as "putting up" so, whats the argument there?

@MigGui: with the "dual screen" sections apart, its actually possible (and on high level gameplay) that you play only with the sticks (drawing shapes becomes aking to doing combos in Street fight)

@Bread_or_Decide: no, it means that the game has dept and a learning curve. if you are not capable of that or putting work into it is not your kink. that is your fault not the game.

@Bread_or_Decide: "But gamespot assigns the game to one person and it's their job to review it from their personal perspective and experience."

thats not longer a review, thats an opinion