ghaleon0721's forum posts

Avatar image for ghaleon0721
ghaleon0721

338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 ghaleon0721
Member since 2003 • 338 Posts
Losing exclusives is never good. Acid08
But it is GOING to happen until Sony or MS starts buying 3rd parties, or paying them off. There is too much money to be lost by being single-platform. The PS1 had a lot of exclusives because they outsold the N64 by a landslide and the development cost on a cartridge was prohibitive for them. The PS2 had a lot of exclusives because they outsold the Xbox by about four gazillion to one so it was easy for developers to ignore the Xbox market. The potential profits were too small to justify the costs involved with porting a game over. Now BOTH systems are selling incredibly well. It's impossible to say which is selling better. The 360 has more units, but they started a year earlier. The PS3 has fewer units out, but they are selling FASTER than the 360 did at this stage of its life. Imagine YOU are a developer. Could you afford to ignore either of these markets? No freaking way. You won't see MS or Sony paying for many exclusives either. No game is worth the price that developers would require for them to afford to ignore one market or the other.
Avatar image for ghaleon0721
ghaleon0721

338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 ghaleon0721
Member since 2003 • 338 Posts
and another things, with all these games being availble on both systems, it's makes the comsumer think, which system I should get to play there games, and $400 dollar system or $600 system, which one will you buy to play the same games?SmoothBrother1
Sorry but it's more complicated than that. The extra $200 gets you FREE online, motion sensitive controls, and a blu-ray player. So if I have to spend $400 no matter what, then I get all that other stuff for another $200. It's a good value for me
Avatar image for ghaleon0721
ghaleon0721

338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 ghaleon0721
Member since 2003 • 338 Posts
Yes, exactly. Let's face it the days when Playstation owners could scoff at the N64's low-capacity, wildly expensive cartridges are gone. We will never again see an age similar to the time when PS2 owners could look down on the Xbox for its miniscule library and lack of 3rd party support. It's a new age and there are TWO contenders. It's like the old days when Hulk Hogan was everyone's hero and you wanted him to win because he was the good guy. Then later on you had Steve Austin and the Rock. Both great wrestlers and fitting champions. Both had equal fan bases. Then.......I don't know what happens after that, I stopped watching wresting because it got stupid.
Avatar image for ghaleon0721
ghaleon0721

338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 ghaleon0721
Member since 2003 • 338 Posts
I think that the pace of demos being released is only slow because the pace of games being released is slow. Once it picks up, the demos will pick up in kind. Though I can say that there are demos that SHOULD be on there and aren't. Armored Core 4, Virtual Fighter 5, Call of Duty 3 and Oblivion shoudl be on there. Demos help sell games, it's a fact. Reading reviews and browsing forums will NEVER influence a purchase decision as much as fifteen minutes with a demo.
Avatar image for ghaleon0721
ghaleon0721

338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 ghaleon0721
Member since 2003 • 338 Posts
Two more: Final Fantasy Tactics Dino Crisis
Avatar image for ghaleon0721
ghaleon0721

338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 ghaleon0721
Member since 2003 • 338 Posts
A good Spyro game developed by Insomniac and a new Crash Team Racing game by Naughty Dog.GIJames248
Didn't those appear on the PS2? I KNOW for a fact that Crash Team Racing did because I have it. Also, don't count on a new Spyro unless some other developer buys the rights. Insomniac probably has their plates full with Ratchet & Clank and Resistance 2
Avatar image for ghaleon0721
ghaleon0721

338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 ghaleon0721
Member since 2003 • 338 Posts
Vagrant Story
Avatar image for ghaleon0721
ghaleon0721

338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 ghaleon0721
Member since 2003 • 338 Posts
This is in response to the guy who posted about wanting a new Tomba game on the PS3. I chose to make a seperate thread since it is likely to go off on a tangent. But what PS1 franchises would you like to see on PS3. I'm talking about PS1 games that didn't continue on the PS2. I'll start Fear Effect
Avatar image for ghaleon0721
ghaleon0721

338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 ghaleon0721
Member since 2003 • 338 Posts
I seriously hope that the PS3 doesn't die so quickly and my friggid $700 on it are gone. I'd be kind of pissed. RELover00
Don't worry about it bud. When you see about a dozen or so PS3 exclusives and/or multi-platform games become XBOX exclusives, then you can start panicking. You got a great system that Sony has committed to supporting for the next 10 years. That is why it costs so much. It's a longer term gaming investment.
Avatar image for ghaleon0721
ghaleon0721

338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 ghaleon0721
Member since 2003 • 338 Posts
No company likes competition. The only people who really benefit are us...the consumers.