GoodKingMog's forum posts

Avatar image for goodkingmog
GoodKingMog

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 GoodKingMog
Member since 2015 • 167 Posts

@ferrari2001 said:
@goodkingmog said:

a rating from 0 to garbage? i give it a rotten banana peel.

no worthwile games.... and 25% discounts? what happened to the 80% discounts we used to see.... and massive bundles of like 20 games for 19.99... this year has been horrible

Literally only one game on the front page is discounted at 25% off and only 4 at 40% or less discount. Stop blowing it out of proportion. Steam gives voluntary discounts on a wide variety of games. Just because you have every decent game that's discounted doesn't mean there aren't good discounts for people. Steam is a business, they aren't here to give you stuff for basically nothing. If they aren't making money then they won't be in the business for long. No company can afford to sell 20 games for $20, that's completely and utterly unreasonable. People on this site can literally complain about everything, even game discounts not being discounted enough. Give me a break.

on a scale of 1 to 10.... how sore is your rear after Gaben is done with you?

Avatar image for goodkingmog
GoodKingMog

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 GoodKingMog
Member since 2015 • 167 Posts

a rating from 0 to garbage? i give it a rotten banana peel.

no worthwile games.... and 25% discounts? what happened to the 80% discounts we used to see.... and massive bundles of like 20 games for 19.99... this year has been horrible

Avatar image for goodkingmog
GoodKingMog

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By GoodKingMog
Member since 2015 • 167 Posts

valve still makes games? pffff.... they are too busy making new hats.

i lost all respect for valve years ago when it was clear that they literally do not care a single ounce about what their fans want

Avatar image for goodkingmog
GoodKingMog

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By GoodKingMog
Member since 2015 • 167 Posts

all of this is bullshit anyway. you arent playing any games made in the last 4-6 months at 144FPS anyhow unless everything is turned down to low. the witcher 3 needs a pretty beefy rig just to get 1440p/60, and games are only get more demanding in the next 6mo-1yr. i have an SLI 970 system and i have to turn foliage distance and shadows to high, with the rest on ultra, just to get 1440p/60 80% of the time.

Avatar image for goodkingmog
GoodKingMog

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 GoodKingMog
Member since 2015 • 167 Posts

it is on sale on steam.... and while it is early access, it is from the devs that made strike suit zero, so it will most likely actually release.

game looks pretty great from what i can see. anyone have it and want to weigh in?

Avatar image for goodkingmog
GoodKingMog

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 GoodKingMog
Member since 2015 • 167 Posts

@Alucard1475 said:

The game doesn't support conventional modding, and the so called mods seem mostly cheat oriented.

that isnt true at all, the game fully supports total conversion modding.... we just have to wait for the redkit to release.

Avatar image for goodkingmog
GoodKingMog

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 GoodKingMog
Member since 2015 • 167 Posts

@xantufrog said:

But what's wrong with them?

why are you bothering engaging him....? he is just a whiner troll that has been trolling these forums for quite some time now. the guy literally does nothing but complain about everything.

Avatar image for goodkingmog
GoodKingMog

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 GoodKingMog
Member since 2015 • 167 Posts

honestly... the more they patch the game, the worse the game runs/the more bugs the game has..... they need to just roll it back to 1.0 and leave it be. the game ran WAY better the first few days after release. i also crash a metric **** ton more now.

Avatar image for goodkingmog
GoodKingMog

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By GoodKingMog
Member since 2015 • 167 Posts

@JigglyWiggly_ said:
@FelipeInside said:
@JigglyWiggly_ said:

That you can actually fully disable UAC, driver signing, and disable DWM?

Back to Win7.

My god man.... let it go, lol..... it's just an extra click....hahahahahahaha

For DWM input lag:

I'm just butthurt that I can't play cs:go or something in Win8+ in boarderless. Also if I go SLI with another 970, that adds one more frame of input lag. That and boarderless = 2 additional frames of input lag, which is around 30ms+.

I mean you can tell on the desktop too. If you have a chance, put Win7 on one of your hard drives and put classic mode on. It feels noticeably more responsive than Win7 Aero/Win8+. If anyone tries it, make sure you set your effects to this https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/46294175/temp/randomwindows/Capture.PNG or you will get random lag when minimizing windows.

About UAC, you sometimes have to click 10+ times if you are doing stuff in your program files folder. It's really annoying.

oh GAWD not one fucking frame.

jiggly you arent so MLG pro that one frame even matters. please *rolls eyes*

Avatar image for goodkingmog
GoodKingMog

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 GoodKingMog
Member since 2015 • 167 Posts

@Cloud_imperium said:
@goodkingmog said:
@Cloud_imperium said:
@goodkingmog said:
@Cloud_imperium said:
@Toxic-Seahorse said:
@Cloud_imperium said:
@FelipeInside said:
@04dcarraher said:
Anyone remember Crysis what they showed us before the game released and after? No one threw a fit.....

Actually, the whole internet threw a fit at that Crysis footage vs final engine.

I think the complaints are just because people are getting tired of shown one thing, and then delivered another.

Crysis still looked impressive. Witcher 3 doesn't even look like a same game anymore. Even its art style is changed and it's a lot more colorful like a painting. It's like they scraped the old art style that was faithful to first two games because it was "too depressing" for younger audiences. Not to mention number of NPCs.

Have you even played TW3? It's just as colorful as TW2. I don't know why people seem to think TW2 was a dark game, it wasn't, especially Flotsam. Also, the subject matter of the quests is a hell of a lot darker content wise than anything in TW1 or TW2. As a matter of fact, the entire atmosphere of TW3 is a hell of a lot more "depressing" than the first two games. They clearly didn't do it for younger audiences. Maybe play the game before bashing it.

TW 2 is darker. TW 3 is more colorful.

no, it isnt. once again, you are wrong.

Are you stupid or what? That Witcher 2 screenshot is from Alpha version. Get a clue kid... BTW that screenshot still has dark tone. At this point I'm 100% sure that you are just a troll.

even more proof. again. you are wrong. get used to being proven wrong cloud, because you are wrong a lot. witcher 2 was equally or more colorful than witcher 3.

Seems like you love it when people laugh at you. Get your eyes checked. Flat lighting and dark areas in Witcher 3 =/= dark tone.

The image you posted has real dark tone to it,,, not because the lighting is flat or the scene doesn't look good but because of the art style. Seems like you've no idea what you are even talking about. Stop embarrassing yourself.

both are images of a forest at mid day. witcher 2 is clearly just as, or more colorful than witcher 3.

gg. you are wrong. screenshots dont lie.