grayfox_2k's forum posts

Avatar image for grayfox_2k
grayfox_2k

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 grayfox_2k
Member since 2005 • 1901 Posts
man this sucks, still sucks as much as it did yesterday, thought that it would calm down overnight but i guess i was wrong
Avatar image for grayfox_2k
grayfox_2k

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 grayfox_2k
Member since 2005 • 1901 Posts
Nomads
Avatar image for grayfox_2k
grayfox_2k

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 grayfox_2k
Member since 2005 • 1901 Posts

SSBM

/thread

Avatar image for grayfox_2k
grayfox_2k

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 grayfox_2k
Member since 2005 • 1901 Posts
Conclusion: publicity stunts FTW! credibility FTL!
Avatar image for grayfox_2k
grayfox_2k

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 grayfox_2k
Member since 2005 • 1901 Posts

i just don't understand how people can't show their disagreement of GS's reviews without getting judged or called crying fanboys...grayfox_2k

:lol: WTF am i saying lol i forgot we're in SW!! "REASON" DOES NOT EXIST :lol: it's just a myth created by cake and casey

Avatar image for grayfox_2k
grayfox_2k

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 grayfox_2k
Member since 2005 • 1901 Posts
i just don't understand how people can't show their disagreement of GS's reviews without getting judged or called crying fanboys...
Avatar image for grayfox_2k
grayfox_2k

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 grayfox_2k
Member since 2005 • 1901 Posts
[QUOTE="grayfox_2k"]

ah i see, so you weren't paying attention! half of the people you were arguing with didn't say "GS is biased" but they were expressing how they were surprised and appaulled by the review... yet both of you guys went on defending GS as if they were attacked by the "biased" accusation (like a default setting)... so much for the voice of reason

CaseyWegner

ok. i should have added that i don't bash them for it either.

wow you should say that to the reviewers! they might learn a lesson or two from you guys before they go on bashing a game

Avatar image for grayfox_2k
grayfox_2k

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 grayfox_2k
Member since 2005 • 1901 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Crucible"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="grayfox_2k"]WOW @ THE MODS GETTING ALL DEFENSIVE :| sheesh!CaseyWegner

consider us the voice of reason. :)

You mean against the voice of ignorance called gamespot review.

Its one thing for caows to bash Halo, and sheep to do that, or lemmings to do this. Thats always gpoing to happen. We're supposed to be the dumb ones. But when reviews start bringing their own fanboyness to the reviews, thats a whole different story.

have you played the game?

have you?

Avatar image for grayfox_2k
grayfox_2k

1901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 grayfox_2k
Member since 2005 • 1901 Posts
[QUOTE="grayfox_2k"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="grayfox_2k"]WOW @ THE MODS GETTING ALL DEFENSIVE :| sheesh!CaseyWegner

consider us the voice of reason. :)

:| so will there be a time when you two disagree with GS's reviews? we're all human here and we sometimes make mistakes (duh!) it would be nice if one of u state a personal opinion instead of replying with ur "supposed" to say

i disagree with their reviews quite often. do i call them biased because of it? no.

ah i see, so you weren't paying attention! half of the people you were arguing with didn't say "GS is biased" but they were expressing how they were surprised and appaulled by the review... yet both of you guys went on defending GS as if they were attacked by the "biased" accusation (like a default setting)... so much for the voice of reason