couple of points that u didnt clearly research. also seems to me that u havent really gotten into KZ as well.
So lets begin. Since when do GS reviews matter? these guys create probably second worst reviews in the industry, with only worse being the G4 crap. KZ was very ambitious, clever game. Additionaly it had an awesome story, and some very new or never beofre seen game mechanics.
Given those factors, the power of PS3, ludacris budget they have now, KZ2 should get massive buzz. Probably second only to SOCOM: Conf. and SOCOM 4 respectively, and that being more or less due to hordes of rabid online play fans such as myself. The thing is very much the same as with RFOM. I found it rock solid, but not amazing. However it was a setup and a stepping stone for a sequel of epic proportions, which is now in motion.
You see, simple minded ppl (such as those that marvel at a 3rd game in the series as one of the greatest shooters ever, while the game is actualy a prettier clone of the 1st two installation, which have also just been simple overrated, and somehow manage to pit it against a classic such as CoD4 and than flip out for losing the battle in the GoTY race) dont have a say so in these matters. Innovation, originality, quality is what drives good games, and if someone like GS gives a trash review, it still doesnt change the voice of those that matter, ie. the gamer. Media writes to earn paychecks, we make or break the games, buy choosing to buy them or not. (Also KZ sold VERY well)
I can give u dozens of examples of multiplatinum games that GS gave 7-8 on the scorecard. So do yourself a favor, learn to appriciate good things in life, read more and get a mind of your own!
one more thing, dont say "dont flame me please". no ofense man, i dont know you, but topics like this are just useless trolling and you are just asking for it! and if u dont wanna feel flamed, take this rather as an advice than!
Log in to comment