HaloFails123's forum posts

  • 13 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for halofails123
HaloFails123

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#1 HaloFails123
Member since 2014 • 25 Posts

@LJS9502_basic said:

@inspiredcup2 said:

@LJS9502_basic said:

No. The games were well accepted by consumers. You don't get that when it doesn't have something quality to offer.

so because accepted by consumer it mean good? lol. logic you have none

millions of idiots buy COD everyear doesnot mean they are good games.

Ugh.....it means it had something to offer consumers. The games were NOT broken....they played well...they looked well. There were not garbage. Just because you don't like the games does NOT mean they are garbage. Stupidity annoys me.

ROFL...

Halo games have around the same user review scores as Destiny. Stop damage controlling. The Xbox has no good franchises and exclusives. PlayStation is where it's at.

Avatar image for halofails123
HaloFails123

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#2 HaloFails123
Member since 2014 • 25 Posts

@Krelian-co said:

a. 500 posts

b. gtfo

c. gtfo

Lol... Asshurt lemming coming to defend their shitty game that only got high review scores due to bribing.

At least SONY has Naughty Dog. What does MS have except shit franchises. Even Killzone > Halo.

Avatar image for halofails123
HaloFails123

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#3  Edited By HaloFails123
Member since 2014 • 25 Posts

I've suspected since the start of last gen that something was suspicious about Halo games' scores. I know how corrupt Microsoft is with bribing and all that, but there was just no proof except for that Halo 3 bribe scandal that only 1 reviewer had the decency to expose.

Now that Bungie is free from Microsoft, there was no incentive from the biased media to promote whatever sub-mediocre crap Bungie produced. Now their games are being scrutinized and graded fairly.

  • 13 results
  • 1
  • 2