Personally I think the PS3 has better graphics than the 360. Because the PS3 produces lighter graphics, in the game call of duty I have noticed that it's worthless playing the game on 360 because you can't see anything, but I hope by this or next year (as many people predict) the PS3 should have better graphics than 360. I think the only game that can show that is Metal Gear Solid 4. Do you agree? And by the way why doesn't any game take advantage of the blue rays capacity? DOC105

[QUOTE="XenoNinja"]Over shiny graphics don't always save a game.FireEmblem_Man

Bu..bu..but teh 1080P :cry:

Seriously, prettier pictures won't always be a grand AAA title.

[QUOTE="SunLord592"][QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="SunLord592"]they actually dont advertise for the ps3 because its not a "HOT" buy. that is why. there is no point in advertising for something, that is not selling like hot cakes. i still find flyers advertising for the Wii and therer never in stock. the ps3 is never advertised because it does not have a big demand. the 360 however is advertised, like you said, stores like to give out one free game with the purchase of the 360. they would advertise that to promote there sale. if they dont advertise it then know one wil know about it, which would mean no sales. sure u can flip that on me and make it positive towards the ps3, but the ps3 is selling a very low margin comapared with the 360 and Wii.

thats my 2 cents, take it or leave it :)
icEx07

[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"][QUOTE="Hammerofjustice"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Can Hevaenly sword do aa+hdr simultaniously?
We have HDR rendering and 4xAA. And the odds of losing either are fairly low at this point...We also anistroptic filtering where it counts (the floor of the E3 demo being an obvious place to notice it...).
http://www.ninjatheory.com/forums/showthread.php?t=252

Hammerofjustice

[QUOTE="shsonline"]Production values are higher on the 360 and pos3. This is a fact. Now how that translates to game fun factor is up to the gamer. But I generally prefer games with high production values.yoshi_64

PS3:
-Had Blu-Ray from the start
-Allows any HDD
-Lots of room for improvement via downloadable updates
-Got all the Hardware features they wanted

360:
-Go into next gen format war? No, yes, no yes, HD-DVD add-on comes out...
-No Upgradable HDD, hmm...whatever our fans love spending $$$.
-HDMI? Who cares? Ohh crap we might need it later for movies, crap what to do what to do, hey lets just release a new SKU with these new features, our fans will support us.

360 has been horribly planned from the beginning.
AvatarAko

[QUOTE="The_Nemacyst"]

The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion is one of the biggest and longest games out there. It has well over 100+ hours of content. Yet it fits on a DVD9...

Heres the cool part, not only does it fit on a DVD9. It doesn't even take up half of the space. It's little more than 4 gigs.. 4.01 to be exact.

With so much voice acting, yet the game is only 4 gigs. Are games really going to be well over 9 gigs anytime soon? Well, they would if

1) They have over 2 hours of CGI movies

2) Uncompressed sound

But with the fact that compressing sound making load times shorter, and the fact that games nowadays games look so good that you don't need CGI movies, why do you need Blu-Ray? Theres only one answer.

For movies, not for games.

amcallister902

[QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"][QUOTE="coratel"][QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"]480=/=600.AcidTWister