Kinda sucks actually tht they are restricting a weapon for multiplayer, but anyway I won't be buying this GOW since it was supposed to be a trilogy, and as a matter of principle, since it's one of my favourite games, I will aknowledge only the first 3 and for what concerns me they can do what they want with this game.
Spoiler: You are the hybrid of a soldier and a bullet sponge and you have been sent by the good guys that kill people to kill the bad guys that kill people because killing people is bad
@leviathanwing Well, I certainly didn't say that, I was just suggesting with the use of a figurative sentence that if someone has the opportunity to play this game should do it right away, but if in a parralel universe Halo was the only game on the 360 at least it would still be one of the best shooters around (if not the best).
1st nobody of you can already try the game, so stfu about the score being "low" (a 9 low? seriously?). 2nd Halo was great for bringing lot of new stuff in every game (exception made for odst), and this one seems to have mostly a (quite big) graphical advancement, but the gameplay seems the same of Reach. I know the game is great and all, but I think that in order to get a 9.5-10 it has to be something REALLY exceptional that brings some fresh air. That said in my opinion whoever has a 360 should either buy this game or throw the console in the bin.
ilantis' comments