@j3diknightdave: Odd, as She-Hulk ended up being my favorite of the MCU shows.
It appears that by your two least favorite properties being two of the three female-led roles, that maybe your issue isn’t about actual show quality
Nope its the shitty show, and shitty Brie Larson as Captain Marvel. but, hey everyone has their own flavor... I bet you liked Ms. Marvel, Hawkeye and Falcon & the winter soldier too, huh?!
Scarlett Johansson has had her own solo "female-led" movie... and IMO it was better than a number of "male-led" Marvel movie & Disney+ shows.
how about Elizabeth Olson as Wanda (in Wanda-vision) cool show, "female-led" (I'm a fan)
Ms. Marvel was also bad, but better than "She-Hulk" (IMO) and, "female-led"
Doesn't really sound like a personal problem with "female-led" roles anymore, and more of a personal opinion about a particular show, huh?!
@boodger: Ah, but what about adjusted for inflation?
or the fact that whatever "success" it had was because of fans that anticipated a film on par or better than, Ragnarok... Boy did they all leave a movie theater disappointed.
too bad aside from a few scenes here and there and the short appearances of DD... The show/series as a whole was complete shit, and IMO the worst Marvel property (besides Captain Marvel) to ever grace a screen.
*not counting the FF reboot, but that wasn't an owned, Marvel property at the time*
My main problem with the time jumps is that its all potential stories they could have made in to episodes, to flush out and prolong the show, hopefully past 4 seasons.
I wish GoT's would have lasted a bit longer... though the quality kinda shifted towards the end of the series, It still was one of my top shows, and something i looked forward to watching on Sunday nights. (same for HOTD)
I can deal with A LITTLE diminished quality, If it means NOT ruining my weekly traditions.
j3DiKNiGHtDAVE's comments