I can believe the pc community don't like this game, whats not to like ? the action is good , it requires a lot of skill to be good at it (at insane and hardcore), the levels are fun and the story is solid . I feel very sad for the pc community because when good games come out no one embraces it unless it has some kind of cult following.

most of the people who are **** about this game are probably ones who have 9800 gx2's in SLI but choose to play games like counter strike and WOW. get with the times, sure halo 2 was a crappy port to the pc, the game run fine but it was way to old to be released on the pc. but gears is good, it's something very different to the same old shooters we have seen on pc's for years such as quake, doom, CS, half life, prey etc. it's a tactical shooter with out being too tactical and slow.

if you don't like the game fine, go back to playing WOW, which is just a competition between nerds on who has the most pathetic life. (the most time to waste building up their level)

People still play CS, HL, and BF2 as opposed to Gears is because Gears of War sucks. GodLovesDead

no cs sucks and bf2 is great except for the wepons that are 99% inaccurate and the spawn killing and overpowered apc's and jets should i go on?

Gears would have to be one of the best pc games i have ever purchased. the graphics are great and the cover system is fun and effective. If it were such a bad game like most people on this topic have said then why was it such a huge success on the 360? it's a great game and i sure hope gears of war 2 comes out on the pc as well, however i doubt this will happen.

Bleh. I can run the game fine on my XP drive, but Vista wont even install the game. The game play is ok and thestory is fun, but even at $30 bucks, I would not endorse Gears for the P.C.roulettethedog

what? gears is totally awesome. i never knew how good it was until i played it. now i understand why it won so many awards on the 360.

sure some people might not like it heaps but if you love shooters (like me) i reckon most people would love it. plus you don't need a NASA Supercomputer to run it like crysis and the game still looks awesome!!

man gears of war is awesome, i know it's been out for ages on the 360 but i don't have one and have never played gears before.

but i gotta say the game is totally awesome in every respect, the graphics are awesome and the gameplay is just sheer entertaining, however hardley no one is playing this online which is really sad because this game makes most other pc games look very lame.

heaps of people are still playing old games like counter strike, half life and bf2 when they could be playing gears which is a breath of fresh air on the pc. best thing is the game runs great on my 7950 gx2 which could be harldy called a new graphics card.

if you don't have this game and have never played gears and love shooters go get this one!!!!!!

hey guys, i am just wondering why i am getting such poor performace out of my 7950gx2

my card is only pulling 20-25 fps on crysis with everything on medium and at 1084 res with no AA. while some people calaim to be getting 35-40 odd with everything on high (not max) at 1280 and above.

I only get about 40 fps on gears of war on high at 1280 with no AA as well, but thats one of the better looking games i can run reasonably well.

since i have had the card i have suspected the board i have is no compadiple with the card, the asus technician said that it wasn't compadible but didn't give me and explanation as to why?

my therory is that the board does not see the 2nd card becuase the performance i am getting has always been closer to a single 7900

any ideas?

x6800

1000watt galaxy

7950gx2

2 gig ram

p5wdg2 ws (asus)

1. Ratchet & Clank

2. Motorstorm

3. Resistence

4. COD4

5. Uncharted

In order of how much they were uncderated imo cod4 should be as 10/10.

fhoeiuwhdousah

fool cod4 ain't underated it scored a 9.5!!

WARHAWK.

MSG4 (if it suck)

HAZE (toitally sux)

Killzone 2 (who knows unbtill it's released)

BF Bad Company (totally sux)

I was not impressed with the visuals or gameplayXcaliber26

I totally agree

[QUOTE="FatChuwawa"][QUOTE="cifru"][QUOTE="jaredrichards3"]

terrible game, poor frame rates and awful graphics for a next gen system that can handle much more. this game is totally average and really disapointed me . my 3 year old pc can pull way better graphics than this game can.

not a solid fps at all "lame at best"

cifru

Poor frame rates? >.

yeh what are you talking about? frame rate was fine and i was playing it all night, not the best graphics of this gen but they werent bad.

did you even play it?

of course i played it :roll: , if you read the above posts.:lol: anyway, i was wondering why he said poor frame rates, mines runs solid.

well it's either poor frame rates or just bad programming (like no buffer) the game does not run smoothly in regards to scrolling when in fps mode. playing this game reminds me of playing bf2 with my 5 year old computer before i upgraded. sure it runs and is playable but it's not a great experience. cod4 is smooth all the way through and is worthy of the ps3 and it's power this game however misses the mark IMO