jrpgliker's forum posts

Avatar image for jrpgliker
jrpgliker

663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 jrpgliker
Member since 2006 • 663 Posts

why even bring up mgs4 in there? thats the online and its still above 720p. its satisfactory.blues3531

true 720P is 1280X 720

Avatar image for jrpgliker
jrpgliker

663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 jrpgliker
Member since 2006 • 663 Posts

So that settles the 'which is more powerful' agruments. I win.Ilived

so, what's your conclusion?

Avatar image for jrpgliker
jrpgliker

663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 jrpgliker
Member since 2006 • 663 Posts

B3D found ng2 is 1120X585(2xAA)

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?s=4880a94bad92e85b7a6f47e5de02c9fd&p=1168976&postcount=63

recently, other fake HD B3D discovered

Playstation 3

Grand Theft Auto IV = 1152x640 (no AA)

Haze (demo) = 1024x576 (2xAA)

Metal Gear 4 Online (beta) = 1024x768 (2xAA, temporal)

and ...... nowB3D began framerate analysis

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?p=1160619#post1160619

Race Driver GRID (demo)

In-game tests
Basically the event is allowed to start, car accelerates full throttle until just before it hits scenery. Scenery is like-for-like, car AI introduces a variable here. But with two tests full of cars and AI in effect, it's a decent enough indication of performance cross-platform. Note that in Test5, there are no CPU cars as it's a drift challenge.

Test4- BMW Race Start, accelerate forwards
360: 30fps (v-locked)
PS3: 28.76fps (32.38% torn frames)

Test5- Nissan Silvia Race Start, accelerate forwards
360: 30fps (v-locked)
PS3: 30fps (18.07% torn frames)

Test6- Mustang Race, accelerate forwards
360: 30fps (v-locked)
PS3: 26.722fps (39.79% torn frames)

GTA IV Frame Rate Tests

Test1
Old 360: 31.990fps
Old PS3: 26.460fps
New 360: 31.627fps (3.77% torn frames)
New PS3: 26.504fps

Test2
Old 360: 28.624fps
Old PS3: 23.452fps
New 360: 29.233fps (4.26% torn frames)
New PS3: 23.989fps

Test3
Old 360: 35.252fps
Old PS3: 29.041fps
New 360: 35.662fps (2.37% torn frames)
New PS3: 29.523fps

Test4
Old 360: 26.076fps
Old PS3: 26.081fps
New 360: 26.015fps (6.07% torn frames)
New PS3: 25.803fps

Test5
Old 360: 26.712fps
Old PS3: 23.781fps
New 360: 26.507fps (4.9% torn frames)
New PS3: 23.781fps

Test6
Old 360: 33.798fps
Old PS3: 28.313fps
New 360: 33.713fps (2.35% torn frames)
New PS3: 28.313fps

Avatar image for jrpgliker
jrpgliker

663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 jrpgliker
Member since 2006 • 663 Posts

if you like movie , buy a ps3 .

for better game, buy a xb360 .

it's simple.

most multipal games better on xb360. like gta4 720P on x360, 630P on ps3.

because most gamecompany felt xb360 easy to develop , ps3 is a hard cookie.

besides xb360 have way better online server, but you have nothing to complain , since psn is free.

one thing intersting is xb360 have released more JRPG than ps3. like trusty bell, lost oddsey....and upcoming infinite undiscovery, tale of vesperia.

while ps3 still have nothing except for ff13 ff13 versus with no releasing date.

Avatar image for jrpgliker
jrpgliker

663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 jrpgliker
Member since 2006 • 663 Posts

here you go :D

Avatar image for jrpgliker
jrpgliker

663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 jrpgliker
Member since 2006 • 663 Posts

they are

http://www.videogamer.com/features/article/29-05-2008-426.html

10, Ninety-Nine Nights

9, Brute Force

8, The Bouncer

7 Perfect Dark Zero

6 Blinx

5 Star Wars: Shadows of the Empire

4 Star Fox Adventures

3 Haze

2 LAIR

and the champion goes to....

1 killzone

Avatar image for jrpgliker
jrpgliker

663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 jrpgliker
Member since 2006 • 663 Posts
not just this game. ps3 version rainbow six 2 also received a bad review compare with xb360.
Avatar image for jrpgliker
jrpgliker

663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 jrpgliker
Member since 2006 • 663 Posts
[QUOTE="OhSnapitz"][QUOTE="strudel420"][QUOTE="OhSnapitz"]

[QUOTE="bayareahusla"]well its worth the slowdown for a better characterblackice1983

you...can't be serious.. :|

Man I know! Yoda owns Vader. :P

Actually I think they both kinda suck and don't belong in this type of game... However I'm finding it troubling that ANYONE would except slowdown in a fighting game and justify it with an extra character. :|

slowdown in a ps3 multiplat

no way

actually, a lot of ps3 version did.

or they can learn from rockstar , downgrade ps3 version to 630P .

360 720P

PS3 630p

Avatar image for jrpgliker
jrpgliker

663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 jrpgliker
Member since 2006 • 663 Posts

by the way, according to ign preview, 360 version extremly smooth.

while ps3 version suffered from significant slowdown. hope they can fix it .

Avatar image for jrpgliker
jrpgliker

663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 jrpgliker
Member since 2006 • 663 Posts
oh, ign score standard is getting tougher.