kilerchese's forum posts

Avatar image for kilerchese
kilerchese

831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 kilerchese
Member since 2008 • 831 Posts

By dedicated community, if you mean previous SupComm players, your not going to find them here in this game.

This game is being shunned by them for dumbing down the game.

Avatar image for kilerchese
kilerchese

831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 kilerchese
Member since 2008 • 831 Posts

Other than those two, I think it's a serious downgrade from the original. The new economic system is fairly confusing. It's impossible to tell if you can support the constant construction of a unit or if you will run out of materials. The old system may be more difficult, but it's much better for a massive scale game than this new, crappy economic system. UEF units look terrible. They have no defining features and the textures on them are mediocre. Cybran units are awesome, though. Maps also feel much, much smaller. Swiftstrike5
Okay, your first point on resources. I don't know how you think that since you have to have the resources available to build a unit before it'll let you queue it. In the first game if you didn't have the resources to build it you could queue it and wait for the resources to gather, but now you can't.

The textures are dumbed down and the unit looks horrible compared to the old SC.

The maps are MUCH smaller this go around. Their biggest map is about the size of SC's medium maps. No where near the size of largest maps on SC.

The voice acting is HORRIBLE, IMHO.

Avatar image for kilerchese
kilerchese

831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 kilerchese
Member since 2008 • 831 Posts

When NOT compared to the original, it's a decent game.

When it IS compared to the original, it's a horrible game. They dumbed it down A LOT

Avatar image for kilerchese
kilerchese

831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 kilerchese
Member since 2008 • 831 Posts

Yeah, dont mean find one with ad on it T.T, but doesnt this work? Dvi splitter adapter or am I missing something(split your dvi port for two displays).

Bikouchu35

I believe that is for running two monitors as a clone, ie showing the same thing. I could be wrong, but I don't believe so.

Avatar image for kilerchese
kilerchese

831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 kilerchese
Member since 2008 • 831 Posts

This is what anandtech used... Though instead of mini, make that non mini. 1920x1200, not 1680x1050.

But they wanted 2560x1600 so they got a box.JigglyWiggly

They probably changed the design of the 5970 and powered the DP on-board, not the manu, but ATI.

Avatar image for kilerchese
kilerchese

831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 kilerchese
Member since 2008 • 831 Posts

Wait what? Why wouldn't a displayport > dvi cable work?

I mean I saw people using mini dp > dvi on the hd5970 review.

JigglyWiggly_

For EyeFinity DP IS required, which is why most people need ACTIVE, aka powered, DP to DVI adapters. For just regular monitors you can use DP to DVI, but if it is over 1920x1080 it has to be powered, that's if there are only ONE or TWO monitors. If you have THREE than go to the EyeFinity part of my post. Because now you have ONE resolution in Eyefinity essentially.

Avatar image for kilerchese
kilerchese

831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 kilerchese
Member since 2008 • 831 Posts

Nono, you can do displayport to dvi.JigglyWiggly_
Not at the moment with current HD 5 series.

Current HD 5 series require a active display port, powered by USB, adapter if you want to use a non-DP monitor. Dell has has the professional series monitors that sell for about $210 USD a piece at 21.5".

http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/products/Displays/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=dhs&cs=19&sku=320-8323

I know a guy on the Extreme Overclocking Forums that has three of these for his EyeFinity setup and he loves them.

Avatar image for kilerchese
kilerchese

831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 kilerchese
Member since 2008 • 831 Posts

Wow, I've hit a stable 4.7...superclocked
On air? I don't think so. With less than 40% Core Clock? I don't think so either.

Avatar image for kilerchese
kilerchese

831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 kilerchese
Member since 2008 • 831 Posts

[QUOTE="kilerchese"]

[QUOTE="superclocked"]Wow, I talked about how increasing the bus speed by 50% or more puts a lot more stress on the motherboard. Seriously, you keep bringing up subjects that I never even typed =\superclocked

I've never increase my "bus speed" over 50%. In fact, I've never increase my core clock over 40%.

*facepalm* Ok then...

Buy guess what. I have overclocked to over 4.0GHz on less than 40% bus speed on my 920.

Avatar image for kilerchese
kilerchese

831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 kilerchese
Member since 2008 • 831 Posts

Wow, I talked about how increasing the bus speed by 50% or more puts a lot more stress on the motherboard. Seriously, you keep bringing up subjects that I never even typed =\superclocked
I've never increase my "bus speed" over 50%. In fact, I've never increase my core clock over 40%.