http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/PublicWishDetail.aspx?WishListNumber=13027152
kilerchese's forum posts
It has two of them lol, + hdmi and displayport.JigglyWiggly_It doesn't have HDMI...
Only Two DVIs and One DisplayPort.
take the build from kilerchese but with this case, since his case is overpriced imo cheaper nice design and good companyNLahrenThey are the SAME PRICE without MIR.
Did you know the Cooler Master CM690 II Advanced supports up to ELEVEN fans?
Two top fans, up to 140mm each
One front fan, 140mm
One rear fan, 120mm
Two bottom fans, 120mm each
Two side panel fans, up to 140mm each
One fan BEHIND the CPU, 80mm
Finally, two fans mounted on the HDD cages, 120mm each
Both cases are also made by the same company. The CM690 II has a hot swap connector ON TOP of the case as well when you want to retrieve data off of a laptop HDD or spare HDD. No need to open up the case any more to do so if you don't have an external adapter.
It's also probably the ONLY mid-tower case that I can think of that supports up to TWO 240mm water radiators and one 120mm water radiator.
I like this build, but I honestly can't figure out why you chose memory with an incredibly high failure rate. Seriously, you can grab some decent DDR3 for pretty much the same price after shipping.I also don't understand why he picked up the 945 when the 955 is $5 more.http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231277MaoTheChimp
AFAIK there is not a way for you to record something on one PC from another without using up a lot of resources.
http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/PublicWishDetail.aspx?WishListNumber=17114008
Phenom II X4 955
DFI LANParty DK 790FX MotherBoard
G.Skill RipJaw 2x2GB DDR3-1600 Cas 7
Seagate Barracuda 750GB 7,200 RPM 32MB Cache
VisionTek Radeon HD 5850
Cooler Master eXtreme Power Plus 600w
Cooler Master CM690 II Advanced Mid-Tower Case
Sony Optiarc SATA DVD Burner with LightScribe
Subtotal: $957.93
Its the Fermi architecture vs the GT200 architecture. Its real (as far as we know). It was from Tom's hardware or one of those sites.
tequilasunriser
Actually, as far as we know it's not real.
Why?
Because first of all, we don't know the configuration of EITHER PC. One could have a Core 2 Duo at 2.26 GHz and the other could have a core i7 975 @ 4.0GHz.
Secondly, it's coming from Nvidia and we KNOW that they HAVE lied about Fermi.
Finally, until Toms Hardware, Guru3D, AnandTech, [H]ard|Ocp, Hardware Canucks or a plethora of other places release their OWN benchmarks and NOT Nvidia's we don't even know the capabilities of the Fermi.
Until than, everyone needs to sit back down in their seat, and not on the edge, and wait for REAL numbers.
I'll actually take numbers into consideration when a 3rd party actually does their own testing and the numbers don't come out of Nvidia's mouth.
Which those do.
Log in to comment