killerfox39967's forum posts

Avatar image for killerfox39967
killerfox39967

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 killerfox39967
Member since 2007 • 91 Posts

[QUOTE="killerfox39967"]

Valve doesn't like the ps3 because, as someone stated before, it would cost a lot to learn thearchitecture, and would not make that much money anyway. Valve is clearly not biased toward microsoft or the 360 because they are now bringing steam to macs. The ps3 architecture is just unnecessarily complicated and to difficult to work with.

Persistantthug

No it's not difficult. Valve has enough resources to:

1. Hire a couple employess with their SPITLOADS of money to port games themselves.

2. Get someone to do it for them like Gearbox used to do, like they did for Left 4 Dead's XBOX Version

3. Get EA to do it because EA is always desperate to put games on as many systems as possible.

The train of thought you are putting forth doesn't add up, killerfox39967. Left 4 Dead 2 would have sold 1 million units minimum on the PS3...that's 30 million dollars in revenue. Since when does any business say, "nah, we don't want to make an extra 20-30 million dollars...no thanks, extra money is whack"

Don't you understand there is more going on here?

Mhm, I guess that makes sense. I do think people should stop saying stuff like "I bet MICRO$OFT paid them off".

Avatar image for killerfox39967
killerfox39967

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 killerfox39967
Member since 2007 • 91 Posts

Valve doesn't like the ps3 because, as someone stated before, it would cost a lot to learn thearchitecture, and would not make that much money anyway. Valve is clearly not biased toward microsoft or the 360 because they are now bringing steam to macs. The ps3 architecture is just unnecessarily complicated and to difficult to work with.

Avatar image for killerfox39967
killerfox39967

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 killerfox39967
Member since 2007 • 91 Posts

[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="Scar_Finger"]bungie is really hurting lateley AdobeArtist

what? they're swimming in giant swimming pools made out of gold. And instead of water, it's dollar bills.

That is a wintacular reply there, Jandurin :D :D

You got it right.

Avatar image for killerfox39967
killerfox39967

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 killerfox39967
Member since 2007 • 91 Posts

Try 3 years. My old 8800 GT still holds up to play most recent titles with faaaaarrrrr better graphics than the consoles.

Avatar image for killerfox39967
killerfox39967

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 killerfox39967
Member since 2007 • 91 Posts

Outside of Starcraft and Quake 3, games are a no no.

Avatar image for killerfox39967
killerfox39967

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 killerfox39967
Member since 2007 • 91 Posts

*Sigh*

The graphical power of the 360 and the ps3 are very close. Do some research before opening your mouth.

Avatar image for killerfox39967
killerfox39967

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 killerfox39967
Member since 2007 • 91 Posts

[QUOTE="Revolution316"]

no splitscreen, linear game=better graphics. thats why ps3 games are garbage single player only games with no splitscreen or online just to bump the graphics. this is why gears, left 4 dead, and halo destroy ps3 games in sales.

Kennysolidsnake

Ok i will get bashed into oblvion for saying this.. BUT SPLIT SCREEN doesnt matter to MOST gamers anymore.. yea i said it.. notice i said most gamers, sure you will have a few gamers that are nostalgic and "old school" and play split screen, but split screen gaming is going the way of the dinosaur and taking its place is online gaming. I would choose better graphics and effects over split screen any day of the week

Well, if you have friends, chances are you like to play splitscreen with them. I mean you can play over the internet but its just not the same.

Avatar image for killerfox39967
killerfox39967

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 killerfox39967
Member since 2007 • 91 Posts

Uggggghhhhh. And I thought only cows made these troll threads.

Avatar image for killerfox39967
killerfox39967

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 killerfox39967
Member since 2007 • 91 Posts

Here's my breakdown:

PS3:

analog sticks- poor

face buttons- decent

shoulder buttons- great

grip/comfort- decent

Xbox 360:

analog sticks- great

face buttons- poor

shoulder buttons- poor

grip/comfort- great

Wii:

analog sticks- decent

face buttons- great

shoulder buttons- decent

grip/comfort- poor

wes008

Woooooowwwwww what a fanboy COW

Avatar image for killerfox39967
killerfox39967

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 killerfox39967
Member since 2007 • 91 Posts

Isn't the reason why hermits are unable to move away from 2007 because of the people not letting them move on? We still have people comparing games from 2010 to a game from 2007. I'm not sure if that says something.

Valiant_Rebel

Its not the hermits making the thread, its trolling cows.