[QUOTE="killzoneded"]

I was talking about Crysis 2, not Kingdoms

I jut posted artwork after it, the comment was not about te artwork of course

Diviniuz

You could not know really, it did seem like i was talking about the artwork :)

And this is news ?

Alan Wake was a PC/PS3/360 project when it started, that is why it was subHD on 360, was not optimized at all

Alan Wake 2 of course will be a different beast

[QUOTE="killzoneded"]When did i claim that ????

Diviniuz

Looks better than any PC game i have seen and 99% same to Crysis 2 PC version too

killzoneded

I was talking about Crysis 2, not Kingdoms

I jut posted artwork after it, the comment was not about te artwork of course

[QUOTE="killzoneded"]

[QUOTE="Diviniuz"]

Actually it is the only logical thing

An epic/medieval game from Crytek with Cryengine 3+ will look better than anything, considering Crysis 2 is the best looking game and will also have the amazing epic world

nervmeister

When did i claim that ????

Crysis 2 barely looks any better than Uncharted 2, let alone games like Crysis 1, Shogun 2 / Empire / Napoleon, The Witcher 2, Arma 2, ect. You're living in some dream world. Codename Kingdoms will definitely be one of the best looking console games though. :)

DreamCryotank

Crysis 2 by reviews is by far the best looking game, on both consoles and PC and will be like that for years probably

Uncharted 2 is nowhere close and looks dated comparing, same for KZ3 and any other console title

[QUOTE="killzoneded"]

[QUOTE="-Tretiak"]

Then how does 360 run Crysis 2 same as PC ?

Jankarcop

It looks slightly worse and runs at 15-30 fps vs 50-60fps.

Its not the same.

It averages 29fps on 360, so no, it is not running 15-30, but nearly constant 30 with some drops here and there

And looks so slightly worst that frankly does not mean much, unless you compare side by side and even then you barely see any difference

Just how thick can some people be for feeling the need to make another thread about this again :roll:

Crysis and Warhead CAN NOT BE DONE ON CONSOLES. It's PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE. Period. Let alone be surpassed. There's no buts nor ifs, if you think otherwise you should learn how to read hardware specs instead of getting a headache while trying to pull out arguments you don't understand.

N30F3N1X

If they were remade in Cryengine 2 streaming system they could easilly be done and look a huge lot better in xbox 360

The game shouldn't even have had a 9 in the first place. It should have been lower then Crysis 1's score for being such a terrible console port. The story and gamplay are just bland and unappealing. The MP is a load of fail as well. *Cod with Nano suits*

The game is VERY cheap, boring, and distasteful. It should have gotten a 7 at best.

Jebus213

Then how come every review says is the best looking and playing game ?

[QUOTE="killzoneded"]

[QUOTE="ExESGO"] Those are called "concept art". They are hand drawn by artists.

Diviniuz

I know, now imagine those fleshed out in Cryengine 3+ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Actually it is the only logical thing

An epic/medieval game from Crytek with Cryengine 3+ will look better than anything, considering Crysis 2 is the best looking game and will also have the amazing epic world

[QUOTE="killzoneded"]

[QUOTE="-Tretiak"]

No. Consoles simply don't have enough memory.

Jebus213

Then how does 360 run Crysis 2 same as PC ?

It doesn't

It does

http://www.pcgames.de/Crysis-2-PC-213107/Specials/Crysis-2-PC-vs-Xbox-360-und-Playstation-3-Der-grosse-CryEngine-3-Grafikvergleich-817206/galerie/1503391/

No. Consoles simply don't have enough memory.

-Tretiak

Then how does 360 run Crysis 2 same as PC ?

[QUOTE="killzoneded"]

[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]No, because it's not on PC. Merex760

But Crysis 2 look about same on 360 and PC, so that means nothing, 360 is every bit as capable

Actually they look 99% same

Here

http://www.pcgames.de/Crysis-2-PC-213107/Specials/Crysis-2-PC-vs-Xbox-360-und-Playstation-3-Der-grosse-CryEngine-3-Grafikvergleich-817206/galerie/1503391/