[QUOTE="koko0321"][QUOTE="station124"] You're absolutely right.
Unfortunately in order to thin the liquid PS3 devs have to optimize textures, lower color depth, lower resolution, blurr instead of use AA filters and the net result is the 360 ALWAYS has vastly superior graphics.
[QUOTE="gerard-williams"]Not a bad way of looking at it really, but it's up to the devs to find out how to make the liquid thinner so it comes out of the larger bottle but smaller bottle neck faster ;)[QUOTE="station124"]
360 has 522mb RAM
PS3 has 512mb RAM
360 has 10mb EDRAM for AA operations
PS3 has nothing set aside for AA operations
360 has new and efficient tri core unified memory
PS3 has slower 90s style parallel memory architecture
To explain this in terms you understand:
360 is a bottle with a large bottle neck
PS3 is a slightly larger bottle with a tiny bottle neck
360 empties its contents onto your screen quickly
PS3 struggles to do the same
fin
MortalDecay
I must say you have a very fanboyish way of looking at it.Ps3s cell alone has more power than the 360s Xenos and xenon combined together.You have got no idea what you are talking about.
Really? You couldn't tell that by the games. Seems like a waste to me, if this is true.
Unfortunately for you, it's not true. I'd look up the facts again, if I were you.
dont worry i know alot about techs...and i dont have time to explain to you how it works :) so peace...
Log in to comment