Okay, so I play a LOT of puzzle games. The regular big-name brand-game market doesn't exactly cater to my needs in that respect. So I find myself turning more and more to indie games to satiate that hunger in me. But the offering in the indie games market is totally HUGE. I mean, like ridiculously huge. One simply cannot afford to buy blindly and just try things out. So I always search for reviews before commiting to purchase.
Now, mostly, the games I look for haven't been officially reviewed by any major gaming sites. So I look for user reviews and Let's Play videos etc. But some of them have caught the eye of the public at large. And always, without a fail, a considerable amount of the comments expresses a certain sentiment. That is roughly this:
This is a game where you solve puzzles and look for hidden things, by a small game company. How come this game gets a good review, when (any random triple-A title) got less?
Do you see something wrong in there? No? Then let me enlighten you. What you see here is an attitude that says that if the game represents a certain genre, it cannot get full points. Just by the virtue of being, for example, a point&click, something like 2 points should be docked, so the absolute max. grade for any game of that genre is 8 out of 10. Because if a f***ing point&click gets 9,5 it's a total insult and a gauntlet to the face of anyone who likes GTA, CoD, Elder Scrolls, Halo, GoW, MGS, Uncharted... Hell, you name it! It just cannot be! It's an inferior game because... What? What exactly makes it inferior as a game?
You know what I think? I think most people who go around saying things like that have absolutely no idea what games are. I mean, I see people loudly claiming that Grand Theft Auto games have ALWAYS been this and that, when those people have never even played any beyond 3 or 4. They have no idea that games have history that goes way beyond 21 century. Have you ever heard of chess? Go? Chinese checkers? Halma? Mancala? Patience? Do you really think that to be a good game, you have to be able to shoot things with variety of guns or that there absolutely needs to be an enemy?
I get that people get irrationally angry when they think they themselves (or what they like) is threatened. But get a grip, okay? No one is threatening your happy bubble. You can still shoot anything you like in the virtual world, and plenty of games catering to that kind of audience will be released from now until the foreseeable future. It's just that games can be and ARE so much more. They have always been and they will continue to be more. And what I really want you to stop and to think about is, how can it harm you that there is a wide variety of games around you and that they can all be considered good, great and perfect? What exactly is there to be scared of? What is it that causes such a gut reaction in you? Just think about it, okay?
Log in to comment