[QUOTE="DraugenCP"]
[QUOTE="Xsan3"]Oh - Graphics never made a game good ?? Crysis??Xsan3
Crysis has much more to offer than just great graphics. If it was all about the graphics and not about the gameplay, people wouldn't have loved it. The visuals helped it stand out, but if the gameplay was broken than it would never received the praise it did. Far Cry 2 will attest to that.
My Point with Crysis was - COD4 MW, recieved a score of 9.0 , while Crysis Recieved a 9.5 . Although Crysis has more to offer than Graphics, I feel COD4 is a much more reviered game than Crysis. Seems that game got the extra points for its Graphical Marvel. ok.. its exacly the stupid "stereotype" that people have about this kind of games. if a game looks GREAT and gets a high score, its ovious that the only reason for this is the graphics, and nothing else.. right? -WRONG! crysis is so much more.. you say COD 4 reviered game than Crysis? i played it, and its still the same. im not saying that COD 4 is bad game. i loved it, its really good... but on the same lvl as the previous, maybe it got more gameplay styles, but still the same. Crysis on the other hand, it has open-world environment, very good AI, different vehicles types, that you can use in different ways, weapon costumsation, and basicly you can do alot of stuff the way you want... and use your own gameplay style... so you still think that COD 4 is better and original if you say.. than Crysis? **to the main topic graphics are importent for the eye, but theyre not a deal breaker. do i want to play a text advanture game? no, but i dont need Crysis graphics to enjoy a good game. usually the graphics are the end. you say all you liked and disliked about the game, gameplay, story[the importent stuff], and then you add your toughts about the visual stuff, that made your expirince better. just like with music, or voice acting.
Log in to comment