[QUOTE="tskeeve"][QUOTE="tango90101"][QUOTE="tskeeve"][QUOTE="tango90101"][QUOTE="-Sir-Poof-"][QUOTE="danjam2007"][QUOTE="tango90101"][QUOTE="Javy03"] [QUOTE="danjam2007"]someone on the ps3 fourms said its going to run at 30fps and only be 720p...thats kinda crappytango90101
LOL...you mean like Halo 3 which is running at 30fps and 720p.
the difference is that fanboys have been hyping this game to be at LEAST 60fpsand 1080p defaultdue to "teh cell" and bloooray, since last year...
and there it is; 30 fps and 720p... pwning many, many cows...;)
theres nothing wrong with a game being 30fps and 720p but this game has been so hyped to be the next halo killer and its being developed for ps3 which "is suppose to be the best next gen system" that anything either then 60fps and 1080p is a letdownUm correct me if im wrong but isnt Halo 3 massively hyped? So why isnt that game a big let down at 30fps and only 720p?
the difference was that lemmings weren't flooding the board with "EVERY PS3 GAME WILL BE IN 1080P AND AT 60 FPS BECAUSE OF BLOORY AND TEH CELL"... like the cows were....
$600 for 30fps and 720p? really...why? you can get that for hundreds of dollars less....
Instead of talking about farm animals and the same repetitive little mantra you have going, how about you try and find a way to debate Gamespot's hands-on. Do you have evidence that the gameplay will be bad (consider that GS has said it is great)? If you do, please tell us. Do you have evidence that the graphics will not be stunning? Countless videos, images, and previews and hands-on impressions say otherwise.
Then what evidence do you have that Killzone 2 is, or will be, a bad game? If you have some, then maybe you wouldn't appear to be a foaming-at-the-mouth, brainless fanboy like 90% of SW.
this is why i don't take cows seriously..
gs never said the "gameplay is GREAT"... :roll:
i'm basing my opinions on Guerrilla's other work... that really, really stunk...;)
what game have they EVER created to garner "great" (AAA status)?
just one...
And this is why I don't take uninformed lemmings like you seriously. You realize that Geurilla was given a significantly larger team and budget for KZ2 right? This is not the same Guerilla that made Shellshock and KZ1. They have something over 100 people working on the game now, compared to the 20 or 30 they had on the original KZ1. That means that roughly roughly 80 percent or so of the team working on KZ2 is new blood. Your argument would hold water if it was the same Guerilla Games that developed KZ1. But it is obvious that this is not the case.
more people does not guarantee a better game, sorry...
face it; guerrilla has NEVER produced a AAA game... and this doesn't convince me this will be the first one...
there's nothing groundbreaking in the preview...
sneek and peak = geow
shooting cans = MGS:SoL (and countless subsequent games)
i just have no faith in guerrilla until they PROVE they're worthy. that's the way it should be, instead of blind belief in a dev simply bc/ they're making a game for your chosen console....
sneak and peak in first person is totally different from gow...plus theres blind fire
not every game has to bring something new to the table of fps's....the only games that do that are the unrealistic/futuristic games like halo and unreal...sry but characters in killzone don't jump 10 feet up into the air
Log in to comment