Yea, I listen to multiple genres, including hard rock, metal, alternative, gangster rap, and some pop music.

Hey, if someone could PM me one, that would be great.

If countries don't like the U.S., then who do they like. I mean, let's take a random country like Poland. Are there any countries that actually like Poland? Didn't think so.

I think that everyone on this thread should vote for Ron Paul. I'd say he's a bipartisan who would shake things up in Washington.

Both he and Bill Gates are two of the biggest d-bags ever. Yea, they brought personal computers to the market, but they lied, cheated, and made their employees work 90+ hours per week. I learned this from the movie Pirates of Silicon Valley btw.

1. Gears of War 3

2. Skyrim

3. Portal 2

4. Legend of Zelda Skyward Sword

5. Batman Arkham City

6. Uncharted 3

7. Deus Ex Human Revolution

8. Battlefield 3

9. Super Mario Land 3d

10. Dark Souls

I got Paul, Huntsman, and Perry. I guess I'm a crazy conservative:o

2 freakin amazing games that you might not have thought of are Banjo Kazooie and Banjo Tooie. These honestly are two of my favorite 360 games in general, not just XBLA.

Tom McShea gave the game The Misadventures of P.B. Winterbottom a score of 7.5. I'm sorry, but if you think a game about "A villainous gentleman with a predilection for pies" is as good as zelda, your opinion is wrong.

[QUOTE="ristactionjakso"]

[QUOTE="The_Last_Ride"]i am not trying to troll, but if earth is only 6000 years old. Why were the dinosaurs 65 Million years ago,? Just asking :)theone86

Yeah, all those objective methods of inquiry are just baseless. Carbon dating is a legitimate method of determining the age of fossils.

And 6000 years is hardly enough time for dinosaurs to go extinct and humans to become the dominant form of life on the planet. Evolutionary change is a fact, and there's no way the amount of evolutionary changes that took place could have taken place in 6000 years.

I think Carbon dating is a legitimate method of determining the age of fossils if you assume that the geological conditions have remained relatively constant from the time the object was formed to the time that it is dated. However, it has been shown that the carbon dated age of an object can be altered by drastic geological changes, such as a flood. The biblical flood could account for this apparent discrepency in fossil ages. However, relatively little scientific research has gone into this because most anyone who rejects evolution is rejected by the biological/geological community, and therefore has a difficult time performing said research.

Also, yes, microevolutionary change is a fact and can be easily observed. Macroevolutionary change, however, is still unproven (atleast in my opinion), and to me it has just as many logical holes in it as does creation. I find it easier to believe that God created the universe than to believe that all of the matter and useful energy in the universe "was just there", and that life could spring from this unorganized matter.