Honestly, I'd say the PS3. But if you have that hard of a time deciding, you might want to wait for E3 in June, which is when all the companies are going to make big announcements. That is, if you can wait that long, of course. :lol:
lolfaqs' forum posts
I already have a gaming PC, PS2, and PS3. I'm going to build a new gaming PC just before Diablo III and Starcraft II come out. I also plan on getting a Wii, and I was already going to avoid 360 like the plague, so I voted 360. ^_^
[QUOTE="lolfaqs"]Wel, duh, if we're talking about "exclusives," then we have to discuss all systems, because, by definition, a game is not exclusive if it's on 2 or more systems.IronBassMost certainly. There's no such thing as a "console exclusive". I didn't say that. But you said:
Well, I could probably count the good games on 360 that I can't play on PS3 or PC on one hand.lolfaqsYou said "games", not "exclusives". ;)
You're quoting me out of context. Read in context, I'm clearly referring to exclusives. :)
[QUOTE="lolfaqs"][QUOTE="IronBass"] Considering that the PS3 and 360 share 95% of their libraries, it works both ways. I find funny you had to say "or PC", considering we were talking PS3 vs 360 only.IronBass
I find it funny that lemmings always try to limit debates to PS3 and 360 like the PC doesn't exist. Pay no attention to the system behind the curtain!
I'm not limiting this debate to anything. I just said we were talking about the 360 vs PS3. I didn't said you can't bring PC or something like that, especially since you already did it. I just pointed out that you needed to compare PS3+PC vs 360, which I find interesting, nothing more. Besides, it works in both ways. PS3 fans forget about PC when talking about KZ graphics, for example.Wel, duh, if we're talking about "exclusives," then we have to discuss all systems, because, by definition, a game is not exclusive if it's on 2 or more systems.
SF4 and RE5 are definitely good games. I have them on PS3 and love them. I thought Assassin's Creed was overrated and the screenshots of the sequel don't impress me yet. MW2 could be good, but honestly I think CoD games are played out. But maybe they'll actually raise the bar again with MW2, which would be cool.Bioshock 2 looks to be a rehash of the first Bioshock. It'll probably be worth a rental, but that's about it
And I already have KZ 2 and will get MAG later for my shooters. :)
[QUOTE="lolfaqs"]Well, I could probably count the good games on 360 that I can't play on PS3 or PC on one hand.IronBassConsidering that the PS3 and 360 share 95% of their libraries, it works both ways. I find funny you had to say "or PC", considering we were talking PS3 vs 360 only.
I find it funny that lemmings always try to limit debates to PS3 and 360 like the PC doesn't exist. Pay no attention to the system behind the curtain!
[QUOTE="lolfaqs"]Well, I could probably count the good games on 360 that I can't play on PS3 or PC on one hand.IronBassConsidering that the PS3 and 360 share 95% of their libraries, it works both ways. I find funny you had to say "or PC", considering we were talking PS3 vs 360 only.
It has until recently. You see, Sony has a massive in-house first party development infrastructure and isn't reliant on third party exclusives the way M$ is. Killzone 2 is just the beginning. Sony's juggernaut of first party exclusives are rolling out now while M$ throws away the few developers it did have like a used condom (Bungie, Ensemble, and probably eventually Rare too).
[QUOTE="lolfaqs"]I am willing to bet you owned a PS2.Not acceptable in my house! :)
MortalDecay
Not until last weekend when I picked up a PS2 slim for the first time ever for $99. 8)
Wait, you mean people play actually play Crysis? I thought the point of having the game was to post screenshots of it.
Log in to comment