[QUOTE="loomlumloom"][QUOTE="Pariah_001"]

[QUOTE="loomlumloom"]ummm the video i saw of R2 was just 8 people blasting away at as many enemies as possibletmntPunchout

And that's not ideal for certain co-op sessions?

didnt look like much of a story.loomlumloom

Because that segment was of gameplay. Not a cutscene.

and more players doesnt equal better halo 3 multiplayer>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>RFOM and that had more people online so its obviouse ur wrong.loomlumloom

That's non-sequitur. You claim that Halo 3's MP was better because it has less, but it doesn't actually prove that more is bad. What's more, the only criterion you seem to use to prove Halo's alleged superiority is its massive community. That's a logical fallacy.

no my point was that u dont need more people 2 have awsum multiplayer. halo 3 only has 16 players and yet its one of the best multiplayer games this gen.

yes i know that some game are better with more people and some games are better with less. but it gets annoying when fanboys make it sound like fact that in every game u need more players. Imagine having 60 players in left 4 dead or gears 2. it wouldnt be fun at all.

You don't need more than 2 per-say, but some experiences can be better with more people. R2 might be one of those cases, I don't know yet though. Just thinking about it though, more people gives a better sense of warfare though doesn't it?

[QUOTE="loomlumloom"]ummm the video i saw of R2 was just 8 people blasting away at as many enemies as possiblePariah_001

And that's not ideal for certain co-op sessions?

didnt look like much of a story.loomlumloom

Because that segment was of gameplay. Not a cutscene.

and more players doesnt equal better halo 3 multiplayer>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>RFOM and that had more people online so its obviouse ur wrong.loomlumloom

That's non-sequitur. You claim that Halo 3's MP was better because it has less, but it doesn't actually prove that more is bad. What's more, the only criterion you seem to use to prove Halo's alleged superiority is its massive community. That's a logical fallacy.

no my point was that u dont need more people 2 have awsum multiplayer. halo 3 only has 16 players and yet its one of the best multiplayer games this gen.

[QUOTE="loomlumloom"][QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="loomlumloom"] [QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="MojondeVACA"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]

killzowned24

ummm thats not my point. the point is more numbers arent always better. Gears of War Horde mode >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>resistence 2 8 player coop.

R2 has different class with 30 upgrade levels ,more players, and a story not just wave after wave of enemies, clearly R2 destroys horde mode.

more players is better, you lemms are lucky cliffy b did upgrade to atleast 2 more players, even he knows more is better.

ummm the video i saw of R2 was just 8 people blasting away at as many enemies as possible didnt look like much of a story. and more players doesnt equal better halo 3 multiplayer>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>RFOM and that had more people online so its obviouse ur wrong.

[QUOTE="loomlumloom"] [QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="MojondeVACA"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]

R2 looks far better and is far bigger.

gears dont even look good imo worse then the 1st. For real this is nothing to hype with only 10 people onscreen its actually pretty sad imho.

killzowned24

yes, gears2 multi does look pretty bad doesn't it, and ONLY 10 people..LOL

the funny thing is Left 4 dead is gonna be one of the best multiplayer games this year and yet its only 4 player. so a 4 player game is gonna be better then resistence 2s 60 player online.

R2 has 8 player co-op, double what left 4 dead has.

ummm thats not my point. the point is more numbers arent always better. Gears of War Horde mode >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>resistence 2 8 player coop.