loserstevep's forum posts

Avatar image for loserstevep
loserstevep

105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 loserstevep
Member since 2004 • 105 Posts
51853.  Neato
Avatar image for loserstevep
loserstevep

105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 loserstevep
Member since 2004 • 105 Posts

I would fist fight every one of those biotches.

Avatar image for loserstevep
loserstevep

105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 loserstevep
Member since 2004 • 105 Posts
Seriously if that was my little bro doing that I'd put him in a head lock until he tells me.
Avatar image for loserstevep
loserstevep

105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 loserstevep
Member since 2004 • 105 Posts
For the first 10 or so minutes after first getting high, sometimes I feel a little on edge/paranoid, not sure why.  After that though, I chill out, feel really lazy and hungry, and my body feels tingly and weird, and like I'm moving in slow motion.  And I always go for vanilla ice cream with chocolate sauce, sit on the couch with friends, put on something funny, and laugh my ass off.
Avatar image for loserstevep
loserstevep

105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 loserstevep
Member since 2004 • 105 Posts
Kill the man, take home the kitten and give it a good home.  Then chop up the man, cook him, give the cat a nice meal.
Avatar image for loserstevep
loserstevep

105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 loserstevep
Member since 2004 • 105 Posts
BLAH BLAH BLAH my taste in music is better than yours BLAH BLAH BLAH
Avatar image for loserstevep
loserstevep

105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 loserstevep
Member since 2004 • 105 Posts
What ever happened to personal freedom?  Why does it matter to you what I put in MY body?
Avatar image for loserstevep
loserstevep

105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 loserstevep
Member since 2004 • 105 Posts
[QUOTE="loserstevep"][QUOTE="Tolwan"]

Theory = pretty much fact? I dont think so

For instance, renowned scientist Albert Einstein believe that to maintain an open wormhole for intersteller travel required too much energy, more than the universe provided. This was a widely accepted theory, however nowadays researchers such as Michio Kaku state that it is possible to make a large wormhole, he says it may take a civilization a million years more advanced than us, but says the to meet the power requirements are not completely out of the realm of possibility as einstein stated.

To this day we are still questioning wether his theory of relativity is absolute (NASA is performing more tests soon). Those who do the same on evolution should not be looked down upon, throughout history, the accepted theory of the day is often replaced by a new, sometimes completely different, theory.

Tolwan

So what part of the theory of evolution do you find to be scientifically questionable? Specifically, what piece of evidence used to support evolution can you disprove?

I'm actually not against evolution. I feel it is a valid theory however, to play devils advocate (Ha, to myself :P) I would say that there are some huge jumps between species, missing gaps, unexplainable species that dont fit in with the charts, and of course, there is still the "missing link" for the human race. Obviously, we feel its some sort of primate, but we have no evidence of what kind, when, what it was, etc. etc. No fossil records, no DNA, nothing.

It could turn out that there is a huge factor we havent discovered yet, that could turn evolution upside down. Dunno, you ALWAYS have to be on the lookout when it comes to science, because - you NEVER know.

I understand what you are saying, but the fact is is that while there are obviously some missing links, the immense number of "intermediate" species discoverd is very convincing. Scientists cannot possibly find the fossils of every single creature that has ever lived, but the ones that they have found seem to butress the arguments for evolution greatly. For example, the intermediate species' between land reptiles and water bound fish have been found.
Avatar image for loserstevep
loserstevep

105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 loserstevep
Member since 2004 • 105 Posts

Theory = pretty much fact? I dont think so

For instance, renowned scientist Albert Einstein believe that to maintain an open wormhole for intersteller travel required too much energy, more than the universe provided. This was a widely accepted theory, however nowadays researchers such as Michio Kaku state that it is possible to make a large wormhole, he says it may take a civilization a million years more advanced than us, but says the to meet the power requirements are not completely out of the realm of possibility as einstein stated.

To this day we are still questioning wether his theory of relativity is absolute (NASA is performing more tests soon). Those who do the same on evolution should not be looked down upon, throughout history, the accepted theory of the day is often replaced by a new, sometimes completely different, theory.

Tolwan
So what part of the theory of evolution do you find to be scientifically questionable? Specifically, what piece of evidence used to support evolution can you disprove?
Avatar image for loserstevep
loserstevep

105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 loserstevep
Member since 2004 • 105 Posts

Creationists cannot debate the specific science of evolution.  If they did any research they would realize how foolish their stance on evolution really is.  If you do not believe in evolution, give a valid scientific reason why.