XXXXXX

Forum Posts	Following	Followers
9526	5	4

m3Boarder32

Follow

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 m3Boarder32

Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

@ronvalencia said:

"I'm sure X1X can run FC5 at 4K/30 (with dips), with checkerboard resolution." claim is FALSE.

That's all nice and dandy but why aren't you addressing the reason we're all here?

What happened to Tomb Riader running at 4K/60fps? What happened to all these examples you were using to support your bogus claims?

Who gives a shit, he was just repeating what he read or saw.

its not like a GTX 1060/1070/1080 is gonna run this shit at 4K 60 FPS either

6 years ago

m3Boarder32

Follow

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 m3Boarder32

Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@AdobeArtist said:

@m3Boarder32 said:

@AdobeArtist said:

@m3Boarder32 said:

@AdobeArtist said:

Are you ready to give up your futile efforts in moving goal posts?

Moving goal posts in what way? You’re the one trying to compare an unlocked average framerate vs a locked minimum frame rate

That would be locked maximum frame rate on console (30 fps). The minimums and averages aren't locked.

But you just can't have what you want, a "fair" comparison. The only way X1X could ever match a GTX 1060 is to create a custom fan setting so low, the card would have to throttle to prevent overheating. On any manufacturer settings, no chance for 1X.... as my video actually showed.

so you think Far Cry 5 On X1X can’t render over 4K30hz? You think it’s a GPU limitation?

Oh I'm sure X1X can run FC5 at 4K/30 (with dips), with checkerboard resolution. A GTX 1060 might also get just over 30 fps at native 4K, anywhere between Med and High settings. GTX 1070, that other card you actually somehow think the X1X has a chance against, could likely play in 4K in a range of 45-60 fps with a mix of Med/High settings.

You been living under a rock? Far Cry 5 On X1X is Native 3840x2160 And 30 FPS with zero dips below 30, and perfect frame times. Digital Foundry has videos a and deliberately tried to make the game drop frames and it never did.

A GTX 1060 needs all settings on LOW and will still drop frames below 30 FPS, something that never happens on X1X

“Now I know why a lot of you are here, multiple outlets have reported that a GTX 1060 or RX580 cannot match an Xbox One X at Native 4K and that’s true”

Loading Video...

6 years ago

m3Boarder32

Follow

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 m3Boarder32

Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@AdobeArtist said:

@m3Boarder32 said:

@AdobeArtist said:

@m3Boarder32 said:

are you ready to be a big boy and compare minimums vs minimums In Far Cry 5?

Yo know, the latest AAA big budget title to release, th biggest sole indicator of what to expect going forward

Are you ready to give up your futile efforts in moving goal posts?

Moving goal posts in what way? You’re the one trying to compare an unlocked average framerate vs a locked minimum frame rate

That would be locked maximum frame rate on console (30 fps). The minimums and averages aren't locked.

But you just can't have what you want, a "fair" comparison. The only way X1X could ever match a GTX 1060 is to create a custom fan setting so low, the card would have to throttle to prevent overheating. On any manufacturer settings, no chance for 1X.... as my video actually showed.

so you think Far Cry 5 On X1X can’t render over 4K30hz? You think it’s a GPU limitation?

6 years ago

m3Boarder32

Follow

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 m3Boarder32

Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@AdobeArtist said:

@m3Boarder32 said:

are you ready to be a big boy and compare minimums vs minimums In Far Cry 5?

Yo know, the latest AAA big budget title to release, th biggest sole indicator of what to expect going forward

Are you ready to give up your futile efforts in moving goal posts?

Moving goal posts in what way? You’re the one trying to compare an unlocked average framerate vs a locked minimum frame rate

6 years ago

m3Boarder32

Follow

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 m3Boarder32

Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@AdobeArtist said:

@m3Boarder32 said:

@AdobeArtist said:

@m3Boarder32 said:

@drlostrib said:

why is all of this continuing anyways?

People can’t accept that X1X is matching a GTX 1070 and obliterating a GTX 1060 in Far Cry 5 at 4k

For the same reason people can't accept the flat Earth model, the idea that humans and dinosaurs coexisted at the same time, or that babies come from the stork. I showed VIDEO PROOF, and all we have from you is your contrived abstract speculative wishful thinking. I've seen people refuse to admit defeat before, but you turn denial into a religion.

Sorry babe, you didn’t post any proof of anything, especially not for Far Cry 5

Video. Proof. SHOWING 4K gameplay at actual native 4K.... with a GTX 1060 no less. The only native 4K games on X1X is Forza 7 and low graphics games like Minecraft and cartoon visuals. And where is your proof of Farcry 5.

Or should I post some GTX 1070 4K gameplay videos? I think your fragile psyche won't be able to handle it ?

are you ready to be a big boy and compare minimums vs minimums In Far Cry 5?

Yo know, the latest AAA big budget title to release, th biggest sole indicator of what to expect going forward

6 years ago

m3Boarder32

Follow

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 m3Boarder32

Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@AdobeArtist said:

@m3Boarder32 said:

@drlostrib said:

@AdobeArtist said:

LOL. Games on X1X (or any console) aren't capped at 30 fps for "smoother frame rates", they'll still have their minimums same as any other game. That frame cap is because aiming for a higher target is just too damn hard. They know it, they just don't want to admit it. Being limited to 30 fps is already bad enough, dropping below that is anything but "smooth or consistent".

And you can just see in the video yourself; for those games that were in the 45 fps average, they rarely went lower than 32 fps. The games that had a 30ish average (far fewer of them) would occasionally drop below 25. It doesn't matter if comparing averages or minimums, more games with a GTX 1060 (to say nothing of the 1070 and 1080) the minimums are still above the X1X limit.

You don't want to compare averages because you know (much as you'll try and deny it) X1X can't match even a GTX 1060, and trying to rely on minimums is a failed attempt to move the goal posts.

why is all of this continuing anyways?

People can’t accept that X1X is matching a GTX 1070 and obliterating a GTX 1060 in Far Cry 5 at 4k

For the same reason people can't accept the flat Earth model, the idea that humans and dinosaurs coexisted at the same time, or that babies come from the stork. I showed VIDEO PROOF, and all we have from you is your contrived abstract speculative wishful thinking. I've seen people refuse to admit defeat before, but you turn denial into a religion.

Sorry babe, you didn’t post any proof of anything, especially not for Far Cry 5

6 years ago

m3Boarder32

Follow

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Edited By m3Boarder32

Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@drlostrib said:

@AdobeArtist said:

LOL. Games on X1X (or any console) aren't capped at 30 fps for "smoother frame rates", they'll still have their minimums same as any other game. That frame cap is because aiming for a higher target is just too damn hard. They know it, they just don't want to admit it. Being limited to 30 fps is already bad enough, dropping below that is anything but "smooth or consistent".

And you can just see in the video yourself; for those games that were in the 45 fps average, they rarely went lower than 32 fps. The games that had a 30ish average (far fewer of them) would occasionally drop below 25. It doesn't matter if comparing averages or minimums, more games with a GTX 1060 (to say nothing of the 1070 and 1080) the minimums are still above the X1X limit.

You don't want to compare averages because you know (much as you'll try and deny it) X1X can't match even a GTX 1060, and trying to rely on minimums is a failed attempt to move the goal posts.

why is all of this continuing anyways?

People can’t accept that X1X is matching a GTX 1070 and obliterating a GTX 1060 in Far Cry 5 at 4k

6 years ago

m3Boarder32

Follow

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Edited By m3Boarder32

Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@creepywelps said:

@m3Boarder32: Where's those 3% low charts at?

DF did you 1 better with a 1% tear inducing graph

stop crying tho

6 years ago

m3Boarder32

Follow

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 m3Boarder32

Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@drlostrib said:

@m3Boarder32 said:

@drlostrib said:

@m3Boarder32 said:

That Digital Foundry posts 1% and 5% minimums ?

God I love being right

because it happens so rarely?

When was I wrong ?

all the time

6 years ago

m3Boarder32

Follow

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 m3Boarder32

Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@drlostrib said:

@m3Boarder32 said:

@creepywelps said:

@m3Boarder32: Prove it. Don't be posting some console bs either.

That Digital Foundry posts 1% and 5% minimums ?

God I love being right

because it happens so rarely?

When was I wrong ?

6 years ago

m3Boarder32 / Member

m3Boarder32's forum posts