[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="Jankarcop"]
This is an opinion.
What I wrote was factual.
Starting to learn to debate yet Gio?
EducatingU_PCMR
A joystick being better than WASD for movement is fact. WASD not "nerfing" games is your opinion
Stay on topic. M+KB is the best when it comes to FPS.
Now tell me, where does the use of analog input in a character movement represents a huge advantage? Analog meaning than instead of having just 2 values (1 or 0, move or don't) you have a range of values that represent the acceleration of your character's movement. It's true that the analog is best at this vs WASD.
But if I can think of anything it will be racing games, other than that, where do you need that precision to move your character in order to do so well?
Mouse is just better for FPS, that is a fact, not an opinion.
The movement of your reticle is determined by the acceleration you provide with your hand and the size of the are available to move your mouse, these 2 factors provide a much better accurate scenario.
When you move the joystic all the way to a position, acceleration becomes a constant value, and it depends solely on the sensitivity you choose. That's why you can do 180s really fast with a mouse, but not with a controller.
I actually have more fun when I feel I'm really using my skill to kill pixelated people, and that I'm using the right hardware to do it.
Your entitled to your opinion. In my opinion the joystick is far better than WASD for movement , and the Mouse is better for aiming. Bioshock Infinite for example is better on a controller because it's more exploration/adventure than it is shooting 
Log in to comment