[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

i sometimes feel bad for you, about 0.5 s before i laugh again at your comments. So jelly, go work and buy a gaming pc instead of making bs up.

clyde46

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"]Wrong URL lundy86_4

So, you deleted it fully? You didn't replace it with anything.

Didn't you get rid of that BMW ^^

lundy86_4

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="clyde46"] Still don't care what you think. Krelian-co

i sometimes feel bad for you, about 0.5 s before i laugh again at your comments. So jelly, go work and buy a gaming pc instead of making bs up.

[QUOTE="Krelian-co"]

[QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

Go back on your account, m3 boarder.

menes777

Busted! :lol:

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="kalipekona"]

What a load of horseshit. So you can't see the difference between games on PC and consoles, but somehow you notice the color and contrast improvements of plasma over competing display technologies? Please don't insult our intelligence.

High quality LCD panels of today are not that far behind Plasma displays in most regards and are actually superior in a few areas. I have a Panasonic plasma tv as well as several LCD displays and I honestly don't prefer the plasma for everything. 

In any case, the idea that you can see the relatively subtle advantages of plasma, but can't notice a difference between PC games and console games is too absurd to be believed.

A native 1080p game on a native 1080p plasma is always going to look better than a 720p game upscaled to the plasma's native display resolution. And if you are playing your games on a large high-quality tv things like aliasing and poor texture filtering are going to be even more noticeable. Certainly more noticeable than somewhat higher contrast ratios. :roll:

clyde46

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="realguitarhero5"]

Even if the textures stay the same, full HD and 60 fps is unmatchable.

kalipekona

What a load of horseshit. So you can't see the difference between games on PC and consoles, but somehow you notice the color and contrast improvements of plasma over competing display technologies? Please don't insult our intelligence.

High quality LCD panels of today are not that far behind Plasma displays in most regards and are actually superior in a few areas. I have a Panasonic plasma tv as well as several LCD displays and I honestly don't prefer the plasma for everything. 

In any case, the idea that you can see the relatively subtle advantages of plasma, but can't notice a difference between PC games and console games is too absurd to be believed.

A native 1080p game on a native 1080p plasma is always going to look better than a 720p game upscaled to the plasma's native display resolution. And if you are playing your games on a large high-quality tv things like aliasing and poor texture filtering are going to be even more noticeable. Certainly more noticeable than somewhat higher contrast ratios. :roll:

[QUOTE="horgen123"][QUOTE="kraken2109"]

They're 4ohm so you'd need a good amp to drive them.kraken2109

From my understanding of electronics:

V=IR

Voltage = current * resistance

Current = voltage / resistance

For a set voltage a high resistance means less current / for a set current high resistance means more voltage

P = IV, P = I^2 * R

Power = Current * Voltage

This is why most amps produce more power (watts) with low impedance speakers but more distortion because the amp has to work hard. e.g. my Denon 1912 will output 90watts per channel with an 8ohm speaker (probably most common impedance) but 125wpc from a 6ohm speaker. However it doesn't recommend powering speakers lower than 6ohm because of the current and overheating.

This is my understanding, it may not be completely correct.

[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="mitu123"]What speakers are those?

mitu123