[QUOTE="markko84"]

I don't know, when I used play MW1/MW2 to relax and see a major TUBEFEST going everywhere, I realize that the developers are the worst multiplayer designers ever.

Infinity Ward sucks. The most lazy developer ever, lack of support, on MW2 the OMA problem never got solved, IWNET with rampant hacking, both on MW1 and MW2 the multiplayer was broken like hell.

Black Ops has its share of balance problems but overall was WAY better balanced and fair. And at least treyarch tries to fix the problems, unlike IW.

turtlethetaffer

There's a reaason it's called the noobtube.

so, back on topic.. i'm done with cod.. I would give MW3 a shot because of raven involvement on the mp part, but sadly IW is also developing and it won't feature deds probably. If they are actually considering the idea of still using IWNET after everything that happened on MW2 ( everybody that play on PC knows what 'im talking about), its enough reason for me not giving my money for IW/Activision again.

I don't know, when I used play MW1/MW2 to relax and see a major TUBEFEST going everywhere, I realize that the developers are the worst multiplayer designers ever.

Infinity Ward sucks. The most lazy developer ever, lack of support, on MW2 the OMA problem never got solved, IWNET with rampant hacking, both on MW1 and MW2 the multiplayer was broken like hell.

Black Ops has its share of balance problems but overall was WAY better balanced and fair. And at least treyarch tries to fix the problems, unlike IW.

I don't know why people say that COD 4 is good, and MW2 bad. They're the same **** MW2 has commando, IWNET, but its the same thing, the same unbalanced experiencie, the same overpowered tubes, bad respawn (altought mw2 improved on this, COD 4 still the worst respawn system on fps history) and a killstreak system that rewards and encourages camping. COD 4 was not a masterpiece, it was the start of the downfall.

when sub-hd resolutions starts to pop-in its a sign of the increasing need of new consoles.

its pretty **** up to have a 1080p 40'' LED TV and play at 1024x600

[QUOTE="markko84"]

a cheap average pc with an a Corei5 + 450 GTS is good enought to overcome by a mile the atual generation of consoles.

However the library of the consoles is what's worth. Dicussing power is pointless and useless, we're talking about 6 year old machines here.

M4Ntan

why would you get a core i5 with a 450 gts? a phenom ii x4 955 with a 560ti would be about the same price, and be beyond better than a single 450. It would be ahead of consoles by 2 whole generations.

What I said was not about what's worth buying, it was just an a example of an average modern PC hardware surpassing easily the current-gen consoles.

a cheap average pc with an a Corei5 + 450 GTS is good enought to overcome by a mile the atual generation of consoles.

However the library of the consoles is what's worth. Dicussing power is pointless and useless, we're talking about 6 year old machines here.

I don't even know how to start.

well it was called that farcry 3 at E3 was running on PC or Wii U, no way consoles could pull those graphics off

also Farcry 2 looked miles better on PC aswell, it looked bad on 360 and god awful on PS3

HaloinventedFPS

ps3 was really bad, looked and ran worse

I think FC2 on ps3 plays at 25 fps

pointless discution

we're talking about 5, 6 year old consoels against modern PC hardware

not dificult to guess wich will be the better version

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"]

BF3 will no doubt have the better animation, but doesn't come close to looking as good as some of these screens. Can't wait for a custom graphics config.

This pic just looks unreal. Stalker using this engine would be crazy.

Ravenchrome

BF3 would look amazing as well if it had ToD art :P

DICE is Sweedish, the country which made Volvo.

Crytek is German, the heart of the engineering world.

Go Figure.:P

What's wrong with VOLVO? :o