I really don't understand the Dolphins I mean they should've gave him another chance its not his fault he got injured again I blame that offensive line for being terrible thats why I don't think Green is gonna be any better. As far as teams wanting him I think he'll find somewhere to start theres a few teams out there with a odd QB situation maybe the Lions?PatsFanVince

maybe 

link

So who do you think will be interested? 

AFC: Pats

NFC: Panthers

MVP: Tom Brady

ROTY: BQ

Super Bowl: Pats

Playoffs:

Pats No 1

Colts No 2

Chargers No 3

Steelers No 4

Ravens No 5

Jags No 6

Panthers No 1

Bears No 2

Eagles No 3

49ers No 4

Saints No 5

Cowboys No 6 

Feel Free to dissect

A stupid idea, it's one thing to have a regular season game played outside the U.S., but to have the biggest game of the year to be played outside the states is just ludacris...:(Ngamer05

why? 

Other than lost revenue for whatever US city could have hosted it, I have no problem with the idea of playing it elsewhere every once-in-a-while. It's always on neutral ground anyway, and since it's watched by the whole world, why not bring it to them?

But the lost revenue thing is a huge negative. I'd rather it stay here every season, but I'd be fine with this.

wallymartin

I think holding it in say London ensures actual neutrality remember Steelers fans taking over Ford Field its actually Law in UK that both sets of fan recieve the same amount of tickets. 

That would be terrible. It would be like having the UEFA Cup final in the US.geaux321

Hey you've had the World Cup 

http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/10183279/2

There are several Plusses and minuses (and being British I love this) to this idea hell here's some possible host cities:

London: Wembley Stadium 90,000, Twickenham 82,000

Syndey: Telstra Stadium 81,500

Berlin: Olympic Stadium 74,228

Beijing: Beijing National Stadium 80,000

Paris: Stade De France 80,000

Your Opinions?