Yea sort of...Some guys at B3D(A public forum)claimed that motion blurr was too good and could not have been in game....Which i dont think is valid enough.

They also brought out the issue of VERY high resolution,again that can be explained from this :

So near 0 quality loss even on that big screen...

I personally think its real,because i have been discussing it with the GT community and the trailer was strikingly similar to the graphics engine used in GT5 Prologue.Obviously better this time with some additional features here and there.

Also IGN already claimed during E3 that the footage was indeed ingame.I think i`ll take IGNs word over a public forums...

Nice comparison picture.Really shows taht Forza 3 isnt anything ahead of GT5 prologue,infact i see a small detail in Prologues ferrari missing in Forza 3s one.

Half Life Episode 1 and 2.(Finished both in one day)

Oblivion IV (Played over 50 hours when finally GLITCH attack and i was lazy)

DOTA Allstars (Play it almost every day at Garena)

Assassins Creed (Played it A LOT,Jerusalem was AWESOME !)

GTA IV (Finished it four times)

Heavenly Sword (start-end no breaks)

Uncharted (Start-end no breaks)

Fail thread is fail

[QUOTE="mcgreddy"][QUOTE="Ambli"]

http://www.gamespot.com/news/6175813.html

That's one, and here's the other Sony funded Rockstar project, L.A. Noir.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/i_teambondi

bingbaocao

Kristan Reed: How are you funding the project? Has SCEA given you an advance or is this self-funded and totally independent?

Brendan McNamara: The project is wholly funded by Sony Computer Entertainment America. We have a long-term exclusive arrangement with SCEA.

[QUOTE="mcgreddy"][QUOTE="desmondsultanas"]So we dont play AAe's? Joke post?

SW_modified

I do game on PC,infact my most played games are on PC.

Recently started Sims 3.Playing DOTA and Counter Strike since ages.And in good looking games,Crysis never got un installed from my PC and neither did Far Cry 2.

[QUOTE="mcgreddy"][QUOTE="clone01"] how is something subjective (to an extent) like graphics able to have an undisputed graphics king? also, you might want to tone down some of the 360 hate. when you say things like "the 360 is done," you tend to lose credibility.

1) I never seriously said that "the 360 is done for" or anything that meant so.Infact i personally think 360 is far from done and a great console. 2)I think since last years fall its pretty much clear that the 360 is lacking in exclusives and good games. 3)Majority of the people,including those who have played RE5,Killzone 2 and Gears 2 will say Killzone 2 looks better.I havent played Gears 2 ,but Gears of War on my PC looks better than Gears 2,so theres no point in playing it.In a way i get the general idea. When the console graphic king polls all over the net are won by Killzone 2 fair and square,people claim that "DeZz siTeZzz InfEstEdZ with Pl@ySlaV3Zz" ...But what bothers me is that the 360 has a FAR bigger base than the PS3s.Theres a difference of 9 million people between 31 million and 22 million. So 9 million more base has a pretty good chance of "infesting" more sites,having more idiotic fanboys...you get the idea ....And even on GS forums,the X360s base is larger as i proved the proof in my post above. All games look great,but some look better.Killzone 2 looks great but Crysis looks better.Similarly Gears of War 2 looks great but Killzone 2 looks better,end of story.clone01

[QUOTE="Supa__Mario"]

"Yeah, we've got it to the point where we can't even put an extra vehicle into a world, because it'll blow the memory."

http://www.itwire.com/content/view/22516/532/

kejigoto

Isn't this like the 12th thread you've made against the 360? Fanboy much or is this just phase?

OMG are they serious ?

Any experts care to explain why ?

[QUOTE="mcgreddy"]

I`ll take 2 AAAes along with a bunch of good multiplats over some flop AAes.

desmondsultanas