[QUOTE="King_of_Sorrow"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="LastRedMage"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"] If you really think the in game messaging is the only advantage Live has over the PSN, you clearly have not been using Xbox Live. :|
yoshi_64
its not just messaging you canbring up the cross media barwhat else is there just less ppl have mics
Perhaps the fact that every game supports full voice chat, and the much better marketplace for starters...
Seriously, I'm happy you justifying your $50.Don't want to compare the two services, but there is nothing wrong going with PSN if you simply want to enjoy online gaming. If you're the bells and whistles type of guy then you would go with XBL.
When you get a online service that has some games with service rivaling Nintendo's support. (GH III no friends support, but Wii GH III does?) or a service with features of that like the Wii's... heck let's just say... online gaming experience wise, its' like playing on Wii for the most part. You don't have Voice chat for all games, some with issues, and you have some features that aren't fully executed properly. That's why PSN seems to remind me of, online play wise.
I'm sorry but that is one game example where for some strange reason online PS3 development suffered. Compare Call of Duty 4 PS3 to 360 to my knowledge you can play up to 16 players on one map on PS3 but the maximum on 360 is only 12. Does that make XBL a worse service, no it doesn't. It just means the developers didn't have enough time to implement that particular online feature in the game.
I have to admit though with Home coming and in game xmb there really is no reason to prefer XBL. But of course try and prove me wrong :)
Log in to comment