menserman's forum posts

Avatar image for menserman
menserman

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 menserman
Member since 2009 • 218 Posts

ms shot them selvs in the foot imo.1. the core 2.they didnt drop the price a 100bucks offthe 20 gig and kill off the corewhen ps3 and wii launched.3 then rrod. so that screwed themwith buyers being scared off. elite another chance to kill off the core and fix rrod. they could still make up for it with free xboxlive make it all gold accounts. let the gamers reward your better servis by choosing your console over sonys psn and ps3.

Avatar image for menserman
menserman

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 menserman
Member since 2009 • 218 Posts

You lost me after 'not trying to troll...'

MizFitAwesome
ps3 is fine. wont last ten years but its fine....
Avatar image for menserman
menserman

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 menserman
Member since 2009 • 218 Posts

[QUOTE="gamefan274"]How many of you without a PS3 (obviously) would buy one if the price dropped around September?TheGreatOutdoor

I am waiting until October to see if it gets a price drop. I was going to get one a lot sooner, but I am getting a PSP-3000 to hold me over until the PS3 gets a Price drop.

dont waste your money on a psp 3000. get the pspgo. after a month it will be in alot of pawn shops for about 130

Avatar image for menserman
menserman

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 menserman
Member since 2009 • 218 Posts
How many of you without a PS3 (obviously) would buy one if the price dropped around September?gamefan274
i thought it was well worth the 500 i spent on my 60 gig.299 will help sony sales 10 fold imo. but still a little pricey for the target sony is looking for. which might hurt if ms dropped the 60 gig 360 to 199. some of those ps2 owners might just buy a 360 and wait for ps3 to drop to 199
Avatar image for menserman
menserman

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 menserman
Member since 2009 • 218 Posts

if you want to take a break from real gaming and act a lil silly.you just turn on your wii. something both ms and sony will fix when their own motion controls come out next year.

Avatar image for menserman
menserman

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 menserman
Member since 2009 • 218 Posts
[QUOTE="SUD123456"]

I guess it must suck to be you then. If you are so worried about console gaming holding back PC gaming, then buy PC exclusives only. Problem solved.

The rest of us will buy and likely enjoy the game.

i bet it does suck to be this guy. as soon as a new graphics comes out for his pc he has to buy it. because he wants to stay ahead of the power curve.... ouch on his wallet
Avatar image for menserman
menserman

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 menserman
Member since 2009 • 218 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="shawn7324"] I agree & well said. navstar29

over or under priced is a matter of the market not you, I, or their cost. if people will gladly pay 250 for the wii it is well within its welcome rage, if few will pay 400 for a ps3 it is well outside of its acceptable price range.

If you guys really want to stick to this, then both the 360 and the ps3 are overpriced. Within its first 2.5 years on the market the 360 has sold either slightly more or less than the ps3 world wide, ie relatively the same. Yet at a $100 cheaper price point. Which would then put the PS3 as a system which seems to offer more people value, since people were willing to pay $100 to $200 more.

When it comes down to it. The PS3 is expensive. Too expensive for people to purchase. I really hate to use this analogy, but its like a civic vs a super car. One is cheap and one is expensive, the expensive one sells less ... of course that means that, that gallardo you always 'oooo' and 'aaaaa' at is overpriced (/sarcasm). NO its expensive, too expensive for my blood, too expensive for many people's blood, but not overpriced.

If I had access (as in was able to purchase it straight from the manufacturer) to the cpu and gpu of the Wii and the OS coding and the same DVD drive. I could probably make the Wii for $50-75. Yet Ninty sells it at $279.99 here in Canada (yeah **** you Ninty for being the only one of the 3 to follow the dollar, when at the time out of the three you were the only one in the position to care the least, ie. PS3 and 360 are priced the same in US/Canada even the dollar has fallen from parity). Now to make my own PS3 ... would probably cost me over the $400 level. 360, I'm not too sure because I've forgotten about its internal structure at the moment (4:30 am) but I could probably make one for ~$200-300. So when I look at the Pricing yeah 360 is pretty appropriate depending on the console. PS3 is pretty appropriate. But the Wii is definitely not.

I'm not speaking of what the consumer gets out of it, but rather what the company put into it. Nintendo didn't put much, where as MS and Sony have.

all 3 consoles were over priced this gen. ps3 should have launched at 499 60 gig no 20 at all. 20 gig 360 shoulda been 299 no core. the wii shoulda been 150 or at the most 199
Avatar image for menserman
menserman

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 menserman
Member since 2009 • 218 Posts

Good lord man the neo geo was almost 1G, anyone know how much were the games for that system?

Majordutch201

hmm. i posted prices three posts up from yours. but i musta seen them in the mag a few years later after it launched. there was a good bit of games to chose from. because i was thinking of buying it. games were 250 dollars each. some at 350. the controllers were like big arcade sticks. there were 250 dollars each. the system cost 600

but like i side before. neo geo had that wow factor. you will prolly never see that much power over the other2 consoles in the same gen again. neo geo was like a aracde in ur bedroom. well u remember snes and sega gen graphics dont ya? after neo geo nintendo and sega were forced to go 3d. they couldnt even match its 2d on their next genconsoles

Avatar image for menserman
menserman

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 menserman
Member since 2009 • 218 Posts

Kind of pathetic how the PS3 after almost 3 years still isn't as cheap as the PS2 was when it launched.

AHUGECAT
worst thing is u need a 1080 p hdtv to get its best graphics for games and movies. unlike ps2. guess sony thought they could do the cheap movie player deal this gen like last. when stand alone dvd player were over 150 bucks. if you bought a ps2 you got a game system and dvd player for 299. but this gen they needed the hdtv add on and forgot the hdtvs lol
Avatar image for menserman
menserman

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 menserman
Member since 2009 • 218 Posts

neither the wii or gamecube had the best *of* any of their nintendobrand games. gamecube wasthe worst last gen. and without wii sports and 360 being 400 and ps3 being 600. the wii would be a big plie of poop dead in the water.