The only difference i can see is the brightness in them...I don't know why everyone brags about who's console is the best.I used to have a PS2 and now i got an Xbox360 but this doesn't mean that i am going to brag about PS3 because i find both consoles equal.

Windows 7 is great, i have tried the beta version.Microsoft has made a major improvement out of the Vista because there was a huge gap between the XP and the Vista users and finally this gap will be filled by Windows 7.We would not have to worry about building a top notch performance PC because Windows 7 can run easily even on 512 MB Ram.Cheers for Windows 7.

Hey its a big change here seeing PC with the console comparisons. There are a lot of PC gaming rig specifications going on (no offense!!) but what about the console guys...? Well we can only say that no matter how the PC graphics looks hardcore but it always gets beaten up because of high budget when dreaming of building a super or at least a gaming rig.I also owned a PC before the Intel Dual Core Technology and it was the best in gaming and to be called a "Gaming rig", but now its a trash and whenever i think of buying a new graphics card it turns out that a better one has come up in market.So for how long are we gonna spend our money on building a big "RIG" every 2 or 3 months?? Isn't it better to buy a console for a reasonable price and use it for 2 or 3 years(depending up on its efficiency).

Oh its the simple difference of time that has changed the looks of the previous game.Gears 1 is better in the dark(not complaining about Gears 2).

Now thats a very odd one.If someone want to play it with high quality they expect us to buy Quad Core Processors cause the game is way too far in next gen and if someone want to only play it they should prefer the minimum specs however a game like this should not be missed.

Thatz pretty nice however there is no big difference between vista and xp (very high quality) but the game looks cool.

Its just the same theres no difference