[QUOTE="exgee"][QUOTE="michael098"][QUOTE="Shenmue_Jehuty"]Gran Turismo will always be better; better graphics, more realistic physics, more realistic car simulation. The only thing it has going against it is the fact it doesn't have vehicle damage. But I can live without damage.
Gran Turismo pwns all.
itsme185
GT is not more realistic than forza, its not an opinion its the facts. Forza 2s physics simulate a car more realistically than any GT game, and like i said before if you want a real racing simulator try a game like GTR2.
gt5p says no.. just play both and on that MOST REALISTIC COMMERCIAL RACING SIM its not GTR, NKPRO, RFACTOR
its LFS BABY!!
Yeah but lets ne honest, live for speed looks so bad by todays standerds, i mean i can play a bad looking game if the gameplay is good, but wow. LFS really sets the limits for me. its not the graphics as such though. its the lack of filtering.
Any way, back to the topic.
Forza>>>GT
In terms of physics, dont try argue, how many people here actually have there licence.
And sure, if you must. you will say the driving is better in GT but who needs damage, news flash people!
Physics include damage, and how your car handles when damaged etc.
I cant remember the article i read (so take this as a grain of salt)
But they said forza had like 120 sensors for physics were as GT only has 60. or some thing along those lines.
Exactly, i laugh at people that say crashing is not a big part of racing, iv had races in forza were there are only about 4 cars at the end of the race...
Log in to comment