mugensur's forum posts
I would agree if it was the first zelda I ever Played, sadly if you played the zelda games before this one or you'll find it's a remake with new graphic and a boat.
And again, I'm not saying the game is bad, I enjoey playing it but it's just like the other zeldas before this one...
Yeah, and I'm pretty sure Subsistence costs the same as snake eater.
Hinata237
Last Time I checked(This Month) I saw Snake Eater $10 and subsistence for $30...Florida/USA so It may be different somewhere else.
These Two...Try MGS Substencene or whatever it was call xD
Also, I was about the say "Mercenaries" but I think I'm way off the stealth section, right?
Yes, and I tell you why:
Different Gameplay from it's past games.
Not Like Zelda that uses the same engine but added a boat to sail...
Gameplay is better, better graphics.
Better story...not like zelda which is almost the same as the other zeldas.
Dungeons are Zelda like, fire,ice,etc...so it's pretty similar.
Cheaper!...Don't get me wrong, zelda WW is good but is not more than a "re-use" of an engine with cartoonish graphics.
Also, Watch as I now get Flame by Zelda Fans who Don't know about real gameplay and just want to say how "awesome" zelda games "are" lol
or Try Onimusha Dawn of Dreams, you can't jump but you get 5 playable characters with different moves, lots of weapons, and i mean a lot.
Great story and cut scenes, 2 discs(I supposed it's a long game because I've played for some time and I'm still indisc 1 xD).
Great Graphics and...check it out it's worth it.
It could but is not.
The Camera could be annoying at times and to me it was too short.
But I can tell you that the other MGS...Subsistence? That one is better, they fixed the camera and has a lot of extra stuff.
Timesplitters 2 or timesplitters future perfect.
These games are great, and they were the games that brought me into liking FPS.
Log in to comment