As much as I absolutely love Super Street Fighter 2, the SNES version was an okay port that had significant framerate issues. It really doesn't belong here.

This is why I sold my cart off as soon as I bought the Anniversary Edition for my original XBox.

A Better Tomorrow is certainly a better idea than "The American Way". The American Way sounds way too 1950's to me.

And anyone who looks on the period between WWII (let alone the start of that century) and even the 90's as socially stable was never really there.

I mean, with thoughts like that, whose truth and justice is the character fighting for?

As far as Time Splitters games go, Future Perfect was by far the best.

Morrowind, while an achievement, does not belong on this list when you can play it on just about any PC now. Load times are effing horrendous (2 1/2 mins to load a save game), and it was unstable AF.

That said, Game of the Year does. It might be limited release (it went out of print shortly after it was released), but it fixes most of the problems (except the save load times) and comes with all of the expansions.

DOA3 was also an incredible 3D fighter, and should be on this list as well.

Must be a slow news week. It bleeds, so it leads. Although I suppose in a backhanded way, it's good that Gamespot has their employees' backs.

I can understand this. After patching, F:NV far eclipses F3.

It also railroaded it back to it's original lore, which Bethesda is clearly trying to move far away from.

What Bethesda wants is their own game, plain and simple. That's certainly respectable. But it's a shame what they're squandering.

You know, Hollywood seems to really be the only place that can get away with this.

If you fired someone for this in my industry (multimedia technical support), on these grounds - something that you were already aware of, that were originally cool with, you'd have a Labour Board ready to sodomise you with a chainsaw if you pulled this, and you'd have one of two choices - rehire and stiff fine, or payoff and stiff fine.

Either way, you're getting screwed right back pretty uncomfortably.

Some have said "Disney had to fire him".

No, they didn't. They could have stood behind him. In fact, they should have.

They knew that he was an overactive smarta$$. They also knew of his growth - he was right. There. Working for them. So they also knew of his actual character.

On the subject of hiring him back, never going to happen. I don't think many people would go back to work for someone that treated them like that. At least not without some measure of payback, and I doubt that the House of Mouse wants to deal with that.

I mean, what kind of product would you put out for someone - a person, a business, or a corporation - that treated you like that?

Me, I'd go for the guaranteed win - I'd go work with someone else. Not just for. Actuallywith.