nergal_lyon's forum posts
Wow, I can't believe everyone is believing this. This is complete and utter bull. Why would Microsoft give it's best franchise to it's direct competitor? The whole purpose of acquiring Bungie was so Bungie would make games exclusively for Microsoft systems and no one else. There have been rumors of a Halo DS for years, and nothing has come of it because it's simply absurd. That's like putting Super Mario Galaxy on the 360 or Metriod Prime 3 on the PS3. Companies get exclusive titles so that, in order to play a game like Halo 3, you must buy a 360. Putting out a Halo DS would cripple Microsoft, because there would be multiple platforms that Halo was on. Next time think instead of believing these stupid rumors. Also, that Halo DS cover is just Halo 2's cover with some crappy photoshopping done on it.bassoonrules27
amen brother
definetely TOS. i have both and FF:CC gets boring pretty quickly. but with TOS, you can easily get over a hundred hours of gameplay
im not into pokemon games, since pokemon yellow version, i didnt liked when they started releasing
like 100 pokemons each version or TV season...so
for me FF III, im more into RPG's, long lasting games..
Ipik_Fenris
yeah, FF III was good, just a good classic rpg
I personaly disliked the minish cap, I found the game way to easy. A great handheld zelda game to play would be Ages and Seasons (to bad a DS wont play carts older then gba :( ).ZkM2009
it was definetely way to easy. but link to the past is definetely the best zelda handheld
Log in to comment