None of the above because they are all bad animes and the reason most people give anime a bad rap. Now shows like Cowboy Beebop need to be more popular.FrostyPhantasm

I wouldnt call one piece a bad animé, it might be inspired by DBZ and Hokuto no Ken a bit (expecially at the beginning and some of the Charas styles), but i One Piece has got soo many cool cult ideas, episodes ect.

its been rated #7 of all Time important animés/mangas in japan...

One piece doest try to be so "cool" like some other animés, but I like it more than Beebop all together... (eventhough, the very first time I saw it, I didnt even like it, though it was to much of a DBZ "clone" back then, but when I took a second start, I stared to understand, why its #7 and so lang lasting)

Naruto isn't even a hit in japan, Bleach is, but it aimes for a curtain (age) groupe of (male) kids, while One Piece seems to be more universal (age and gender)

One piece is by far surperior, it has so many crazy ideas, lovable characters, and small sidestories, wich all fit perfectly together (and it can even make me cry).. (but the One Piece movies dont seem to catch the magic like the series does)

Naruto and Bleach dont have such great humor, they seemed to have more "typical" manga/animéaction than OP, and they both seem try to be "cool" (to much of the "shonen" style, to captcher youg kids, who want to be "cool" to, while One Piece takes that "coolness" with humor)

(without one piece, there would have probably never made the movies pirates of the carabean)

I do think that Coop games will be the future to a certain point.

There will be games that will stay singleplayer, I hope there will be. Like Zelda, I like playing that game single, so that i can dive into that world and desolve in to it completly, like reading a book, or watching a Movie in the theaters (were no one speeks, because everybody's so concentrated on the movie). If such games where made single and coop, there could be a deficit in the singleplayer mode, because it has to work also for the coop mode, but that doesn't have to be.

But such games like Halo, Gears of War, COD5 and expecially Left 4 Dead, show that some games are a lot more fun and exciting when played Coop, I think that there will be more Coop games to come, since they seem to sell "longer", Bioshock, fable, fallout, zelda are great games to play alone, but the Coop games seem to sell better (OK fable has a coop mode to, but it really isnt' a coop game..), maby because one can convince a friend to buy the same game to, to play together if it has a coop mode, and a lot of kids do play with each other i guess....,

and I hope to see some further great coop games..(GOW and now L4D have paved the path for new great Coop games, just like Goldeneye N64 and Rainbow six did back then..)....but I hope that there will still be great singleplayer games to come....(who knows, maby in the future every game will have a single and coop mode, who knows....)

I'd be happy if a patch would come out, so that we can play the second and third map versus to, I'm stating to get a bit board of the mercy and blood harvest, even if I keep finding new things and methods (including glitches, wich souldn't all be removed, they give the game a certain charm..)

in one houre from know, some German friend and I would like to kick some ... from you US guys, anyone good enough to fight us in Left 4 Dead? (other Player keep leaving, because they lose so bad always...).

please only come if you have a mic (so you can coordinate a bit)

Gamertag: DaREALGoldeneye (small-/captial- wrighting!)

have got a survival instinct big enough to survive us?

How does a score makes a game better than the other one? They rate games for what they offer.

I prefer MGS4 over Halo 3.Though they're different in terms of genre, Halo 3 is an FPS and to be honest there are TOOOOOOOO many FPSs out there whereas there aren't many stealth story driven games which makes the Metal Gear saga kinda one of a kind. Splinter Cell isn't half as good as MGS3 to begin with. MGS4 is unique.

null_is_zero

2) give MGS the gameplay of a Splinter Cell, and it would blow it on the moon....

3) FPS or not, Halo not only hat an epic singleplayer, it also has the better Multiplayer

4) MGS4 is just like Halo3, looks great, plays like a old-generation Game (jsut like GTA4...)

5) Halo3, MGS4 and GTA4 (and Zelda TP i'm afraid) all play like old-generation games, but Zelda TP (Wii) has at least one element, that could not of been done on the last gen....

6) Gears of War is the real thing, it's nothing like anything from the last generation .

...if GOW2 doesn't win the GOTY, then why dont we just go back to playing MGS1 on the PS1 and watch some cool animé movies, because that's what it's like....

(if somebody doesnt know Metal Gear Solid, then that somebody would never say MGS4 is game of the year...... he'd say "it has cool cinematics, but Splinter Cell playes better".)

edit:

GOW2 and Left 4 Dead (Fable2 and Fallout3 not far behind....and Deadspace)

the only game that can come up to Halo 3 Multiplayer is COD4,...............resitance 1 is more like a medal of honor with aliens, or maby like COD2 nothing realy special today, resitance 2 is more of the same, but wich more and more of evrerything, more levels, more locations, more gore, more weapons, more "scary levels but alos more ideas stollen from every shooter out there (alien bosses like in meteroid, big gun aliens like in GoW, horor levels like in condemned or left 4 dead................................

but ther is a game that definitly can take it up with halo 3 multiplayer in my opinion:

GoW 1 kicks Halo 3 in the a... ,but then again GoW isnt' a "real" ego shooter......and if you never played GoW 1, you'll have some starting problems agains the GoW cracks.....(GoW is the only game I know, that when it came out some gamers refused to play anyother shooter again, they've stuck to GoW 1 till now, ...........

it's shooter-multiplayer expierience stands alone out there (the chainshaw, the new healing the wounded feeling like never before, the rushing to the next cover feeling, the running feeling at all, the "heavy metal" weapon feeling, the crazy grafix, the cool and freash use of weapons, the cool locust character to use, the gore,...........GoW 1 started a new area in shooting games like Halo 1 and 2 did at its time.........

Fallout 3 and Fable 2 (I live in europe, Gears of War 2 and Resistance 2 have't come out yet.....)

(eventhough I expected a bit more from Fallout 3, after Mass Effect last year and I eventhough Fable 2 made some disimprovements compared to Fable 1, no "hotkeys", no armors, a bit les humor,.....Fallout 3 and Falbe 2 are both my top of the year so far.........)

but the best game of the year up to now, wich isn't a sequel, is Dead Space

wich ist your not a sequel game of the year so far?

[QUOTE="ninboxstation"][QUOTE="TheLegendKnight"]

no and probably no game will convince me because if its good, it will be on PC, sooner or later.

imo, 360 = waste of money, PC = investment

doyousmellthat

I

Gears of War Online comuntity is great, and you really have to be a good gamer, to be able to survieve with the pad (the mous is just to simple to use and doesn't have the doulbe analoge strve and look feeling,....the designer take a lot more time to fit the pad controlles on the conosles than on the PC...........Halo 3 isn't really a bad reason either........and Falbe 2.......

yes Gears of War 2 and Fable 2 should come out on the PC to, but Micorsoft learned it this time around, it wont come out till there way to "old" like Halo 2 back then, if they do at all, like Halo 3 now, Microsoft announce the games are really 360 exclusive this time, not like GoW 1 and Fable 1.....( and if then probaly also without any significint better grafix like Halo 2 had back then.......)......the 360 grafix are really good enough, but no bugs, fast loading, plugnplay, great Online machtes, cool feeling on a big TV, Final Fantasy 13, Resident Evil......

No bugs? LOL, consoles game have plenty of bugs now, and RE5 is announced to be coming to PC same timer as console. and it is hardly a waste of money upgrading, as you do noy need to do it very much if you know what you are doing. Yo do not need tp upgrade each year, thanks for showing your total lack of hardware knowledge, don't comment on something you obviously don't understand. Also, a PC does so much mroe and does it better, cost is relative isn't it? Fable II wil also be PC, PC has its own exclusives Crysis, Stalker, Diablo III, NWN2, Starcraft, etc..... Not a bad reason to game on PC, plus most console games with more features and better graphics. You get what you pay for, if cost is the only argument for consoles, then well, that says a lot.

You would be surprised how cheap gaming on PC is, especially when you pay for Xbox live, and games on console are 20 bucks mroe expensive, if i bought all the games i own on 360, plus factor in you need a HDTv or good monitor just to have decent graphics on console, it is eye opening how cheap Pc gaming can be. I build my own and sell my old stuff on e-bay, i have only upgraded once since the 360 was launched, i spent less money then what i paid for my 360, and my PC maxes all game out on 1680 X 1050, and they look much nicer then my 360 ever did, plus i get mods, the CHOICE to play with gamepad or K/M. Pc gaming gives choice. You get what you pay for hey?

If you bought a PC and invested in great grafix for strategie games, then I don't know.........

you mean waste money on the PC-upgrades you have to do each year or so, so you can keep up with the grafix & co........no you don't have to upgrad every year, but every second year, either more ram, or a bigger Harddisk, or a better grafix support,......so you're telling me you'll only uprade once (or twice) your PC for great grafix

ir fable 2 comming to PC, then Cryis Warhead's comming to the box, and stalker wouldn't suprise me....

sure the consoles have some bugs, about a ration 1:10 compared to the PC's.....and you don't need a HD TV for good grafix on the 360 (the resolution might not be so extrem, but you don't need it so far up, inless your sitting 15 inches from the TV.....and on a normal old Tv, the metal/shinning colors are so much brighter, (exept for the PS3, that really sucks on a normal TV, the 360 doesnt at all)..... a LCD TV, Monitor can't compare to the colors und Metal/shinning effects of a normal TV...(inless you spend a hell of a lot $$$...),... how many Games can you play splitt Screenn on your PC?

yes the games ar 20 $ more expensive, less bugs, fast plug'n play, often a extras like split screen gaming, trophys, perfect pad contolles (wich are not so finetuned on the PC, also due to the fact the grafix fluidity varie to much on each PC), you can hook the 360 to all TV's, to PC monitors,.......play the games on the couche in the livingroom with friends, not alone in the bedroom......(how the **** are you going to play with your friend Gears or War with your friendt Koop offline............It's still the most fun playing sptlttscreen with a friend next to you, and the grafx of gears of war splitscreen was jsut a good as the solo game.......(I know, on a PC it had better resolutions and so on.......but on big TV (not even HD necesserall) it's qiut cool..........

Resident Evil play it a mouse ?!?!?! (right, the pad controlles on the PC are going to be great....)

the PC is a working machine, if you like strategie games it's fine (or three to four killer grafix games, wich need a new grafix card and bigger ram and the latest mutiple core processor, wich doesn't cost as much as 360??, if you bougth your PC, when the 360 came out, you'll have to have changed all those three things.....for what, a better resolution and a bit wider horizont.........the grafix on the 360 are just fine.......if you need more, youll keep needing more each time one game comes out to promise better grafix with a new hardware....it's the nature of mankinde, they either are happy with what they have, or they keep needing more and wont stop with the last hardware upgrade, if a game comes out promising better grafix with that hardware.......)

no and probably no game will convince me because if its good, it will be on PC, sooner or later.

imo, 360 = waste of money, PC = investment

TheLegendKnight

you mean waste money on the PC-upgrades you have to do each year or so, so you can keep up with the grafix & co.......

Gears of War Online comuntity is great, and you really have to be a good gamer, to be able to survieve with the pad (the mous is just to simple to use and doesn't have the doulbe analoge strve and look feeling,....the designer take a lot more time to fit the pad controlles on the conosles than on the PC...........Halo 3 isn't really a bad reason either........and Falbe 2.......

yes Gears of War 2 and Fable 2 should come out on the PC to, but Micorsoft learned it this time around, it wont come out till there way to "old" like Halo 2 back then, if they do at all, like Halo 3 now, Microsoft announce the games are really 360 exclusive this time, not like GoW 1 and Fable 1.....( and if then probaly also without any significint better grafix like Halo 2 had back then.......)......the 360 grafix are really good enough, but no bugs, fast loading, plugnplay, great Online machtes, cool feeling on a big TV, Final Fantasy 13, Resident Evil......