C'mon, LJS! Don't you know the 1st rule of Interweb debating? The winner is the first person to state "I win".ElZilcho90

ElZilcho is unmistakably correct so suck it up and accept defeat.

[QUOTE="nintendo-boy"]

Well first off, you are not unbeatable just as some of these sensable and nice people have stated, and secondly your second quote of me would maybe do something had you not CUT OFF HALF OF THE SENTENCE. If this doesn't prove I won then I don't no what does, cuz if you had any confidnece in youre so called victory, you wouldn't have to stoop so low as to cheating.

LJS9502_basic

Give it a rest dude....jeez. You're trying so hard to prove something and you're not. I put your post up that was in reference to what I was talking about....you've been wrong this entire time starting with you expecting me to know what you meant when all I had to go on was your initial post.

Note: I cut this down as well.....

I'm simply defending myself. I'm not just gonna sit here and watch you bash everything I say. I don't back down, and I don't surrender when I dont have to.

[QUOTE="nintendo-boy"]

Well I did a damn good job keeping up with you, and I still did use the word ignorant correctly. Also, I NEVER said documents are worthless, you are completely misunderstanding what I said. I never said history is ALL assumption, I said the blank spots in between documents are assumption. You sir still lost. Also, the fact that you don't read other post besides the ones stated directly to you shows you are to lazy to keep up with all the facts.

I still won.

LJS9502_basic

Nah...but if that helps you to sleep....

Considering history itself is nothing more than a bunch of assumptions and educated guesses nintendo-boy

Are you sure that's all history is? I don't see anything in that statement about facts....which are always present in history. Nice try....

Well first off, you are not unbeatable just as some of these sensable and nice people have stated, and secondly your second quote of me would maybe do something had you not CUT OFF HALF OF THE SENTENCE. If this doesn't prove I won then I don't no what does, cuz if you had any confidence in youre so called victory, you wouldn't have to stoop so low as to cheating.

You lost. Deal with it.

Does anyone even read the message that Nintendo sends them?rjs927

I DID!!!

[QUOTE="nintendo-boy"]

Now, if you will excuse me from this argument which you have done so poorly to keep up with, I have errands to run. Oh, by the way, youve been arguing with someone who isn't even old enough to drive yet.

Congrats on losing to a 14 year old

LJS9502_basic

The 14 year old lost...he just doesn't understand that yet.;)

Well I did a damn good job keeping up with you, and I still did use the word ignorant correctly. Also, I NEVER said documents are worthless, you are completely misunderstanding what I said. I never said history is ALL assumption, I said the blank spots in between documents are assumption. You sir still lost. Also, the fact that you don't read other post besides the ones stated directly to you shows you are to lazy to keep up with all the facts.

I still won.

Now, if you will excuse me from this argument which you have done so poorly to keep up with, I have errands to run. Oh, by the way, youve been arguing with someone who isn't even old enough to drive yet.

Congrats on losing to a 14 year old

[QUOTE="ElZilcho90"][QUOTE="nintendo-boy"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="quiglythegreat"]I think his arguement is that Christianity would've been nothing had it not been for Constantine's adopting it as the Roman state religion.
nintendo-boy

Since the religion did exist prior to Constantine...that is his ASSUMPTION....doesn't mean it's true.;)

Considering history itself is nothing more than a bunch of assumptions and educated guesses based on documents and writings that are quite often loosely peiced together, your argument really holds no value.

According to that logic, neither would yours. Or anyone else's.

Exactly. Thats why none of us really have any place trying to prove each other wrong without hard evidence. We all have our opinions, and we should all respect each others.

There's where I said it buddy. You are the one who has entered this argument with only half the facts. Not to mention that considering the evidence at hand, my use of the word ignorant is completely justifiable.