nomailx's comments

Avatar image for nomailx
nomailx

483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

This game doesn't worth 60$, period. It was first conceived as a Free to play game which they changed to a paid title because their HotS in game purchase marketing has failed. They realized that selling skins in a FPS was retarded. So they changed their strategy: Over pay websites for Reviews, Over hype the game in advertising and sell whatever they can.

Remember that Overwatch was suppose to be just a PVP Arena for the game "Project Titan". They are trying to sell you the leftovers of the carcass of a dead project to save their investment. Don't fall for it!

Real Score: As a Free to Play game, this game deserves a "6".

As a Paid game, it's a "4" at maximum. No depth, chaotic mechanics, lack of any tactic or strategy, basic graphics, Disney like shallow one dimensional characters.

PS: I gave it a "1" to balance the overhype. (and a "0" in metacritics, obviously).

Avatar image for nomailx
nomailx

483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

Edited By nomailx

Tactical Depth? Stay in a Square 60 seconds is Tactical Depth?? How much Blizz payed you?

Imagine the Horror! You didn't play the Beta and you actually believe this review and pay money for this pce of crap you will forget after 2 days!

(Played the Beta 2 days then uninstalled).

Avatar image for nomailx
nomailx

483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

As usual, a "6 at max" game gets a 9

Well, at least they released an Open Beta so you could see how crappy the game is and not trust any Reviews.

Avatar image for nomailx
nomailx

483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

Edited By nomailx

This is what happens when you can't buy reviews!!!!

http://www.metacritic.com/movie/warcraft?ref=hp

Finally Blizzard can't pay their way with paid reviews and fanboys.

Avatar image for nomailx
nomailx

483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

@jdavidlove1: Graphics are Great? Pls go watch a Disney Movie then and leave games to gamers.

Avatar image for nomailx
nomailx

483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

@silv3rst0rm: You are comparing Counter Strike to this pce of crap??? Really?

Avatar image for nomailx
nomailx

483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

@mcullinan: "The Graphics are jaw dropping"??? really? What's the last FPS you played? Quake 2?

Avatar image for nomailx
nomailx

483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

Review in Progress: Calling Blizzard asking for a Check.

This game worth a "6" at max, but watch all the reviews everywhere over hyping this game to at least a "9".

Avatar image for nomailx
nomailx

483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

Because there's not enough Jennifer Lawrence in movies..

Avatar image for nomailx
nomailx

483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

LoL! Yeah sure. Blizzard takes it so seriously that since Diablo 1 there are cheaters in all Blizzard games, and this one won't be different. They will just ban a few account for show and then the cheat will go on.

Blizzard has been most incompetent in all its games on fighting cheats. WoW, Diablo 1, 2, 3, Starcraft 2 HotS, HotS. As long as they keep hosting games in player machines, they can't fight it.

They need to follow Valve route to get rid of cheats for good. Hosting games in their own servers.