[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"]Well according to Cows, Halo 3 = Halo 2 with incremental graphical touches which is a slight upgrade from Halo 1..only difference here is that neither Halo sucked sweaty man meat.
What have you got to judge if not a predecessor. "Buh buh t3h devs said..." I'm 100% sure they were saying the same things to themselevs the first go 'round because who wants to make a sucky game..errm..not so good game?
The proof will be in the pudding, in the mean time you judge the rotten pudding in the back of your fridge not off the word of the people who left it there :D
thrones
Personally, I'm judging the pudding by seeing the pudding on display, and from taste testers tasting what seems to be a Delicious pudding.Um, I don't believe I ever bad mouth any of the Halos, in fact I liked them all, but why even bring it up?
I didn't really understnad what you were trying to tell me in your 2nd paragraph, but yeah, if killzone 1 was SO bad, the developes would try to make it better in whatever way with their second attempt, they would not keep it the same with upgraded graphics.
As for the pudding... I know you didn't put the pudding(KZ2) in the back of the fridge, so why should I listen to someone who doesn't know if it is rotten or not either?
Log in to comment