@rhollingsworth @emperiox Beta, and then some. Runes aren't that great in how each one supposedly compliments your skill and it's not varied. Each person pretty much can still be the same thing, Diablo II, your characters has "many" and I mean many types of builds that you wouldn't expect that would be stat and skill based, also unique.
@MarcJL31 I think they used a popular title to put this kind of thing you wouldn't expect out of a game like Diablo. Knowing that many people will buy into it.
@rhollingsworth @emperiox I've played and seen the skill tree. It's simplified to hell, and many people that I know as well that has the game feel the same way. You've commented on the visuals of a game the way you did, that's pretty damn shallow.
@xMoonDevilx @Talavaj @xMoonDevilx Posting this again since I didn't see it pop up but again, Diablo 3 isn't an mmo. It's expected of most MMO games but not genres that are similar to Diablo.
@emperiox "expect me to lower my standards to go into a game with sprites and pixels" Shows how shallow gamers are nowadays lol. Played Runescape and don't like it but they're at least a f2p game that you didn't have to buy.
Not sure, but you didn't require a 24/7 online connection to play even single player. Auction House would be fine if it didn't have actual currency transaction.
Though I felt Blizzard was a better company before. Now it seems to be mostly about filling their pockets since it is now "Actiblizzard". It's been awhile since I've played the last Diablo II, but it's hard to explain compared to how times are now.
Though I'm against it coming to the consoles, if they can do it right, then by all means they should do it. Though as long as you can x-platform it with consoles and PC, I think it'd work better that way.
oipluckie's comments