oldschoolplayer's forum posts
[QUOTE="auron9000"]i dont know how 360 is showing its age when all multi platform games generally look better on the 360...Mabooza
When devlopers have to tweak a game to run at lower-than HD resolutions to get a decent frame rate, that's not a promising sign of longevity. Halo 3 runs at 640p and CoD4 runs at 600p. Don't get me wrong, they still look good. But it is a sign that developers have already pushed the hardware to its limits and must make compromises.
I agree to some extent but you have to remember all the action that is taking place on that screen at one time in Halo and COD. I think this is more of developer issue that the machine itself. They are probably learning more everyday about the 360 and PS3 but they have to get to a point where they release a game to the best of their ability for the players.
I would say just pump out another mediocre WWII game, since Infinity Ward isn't working on it.
Just let Treyarch make their WWII game, then next time around when it is Infinity Ward's turn, they can make another modern warfare.
I think if they pumped out modern shooters everytime, it would start to get stale. Especially if Treyarch makes them.
jakedogg14
I agree. Why change the rotation when things are working so well. - COD2 (great)- Cod3 (Pretty Good) -COD4 (incredible)- COD 5 (uh well see)- COD Modern Warfare 2 ( TBA)
Maybe you just suck? I make over 10 kills easily, not to sound concieted.Matt2556
no we don't think you're conceited, especially now since we know you can't spell conceited.
Log in to comment