I support it. Imagine protecting your family by killing some hoodlum in your house, only to get sued by said hoodlum's family. **** that. Kritical_Strike
That's how I think. Like I told my friend, they can't sue you if they're dead.
To put things into perspective. The Naga Jolokia can be as much as 420 times hotter than a Jalapeno. I'd figure out the difference between a Habanero and a Naga Jolokia but there are many different species of Habanero, some actually have almost no heat at all. Needless to say the Naga is quite a bit hotter than even the spiciest Habanero.
FalcoLX
The Red Savina Habanero comes very close. The thing about peppers is, it's hard to reproduce the same heat level over and over. I've ate a Naga Jolokia and it was very bad, but I personally think the Dorset Naga and the Bhut Jolokia are hotter.
Bhut and Naga Jolokia are the same peppers just different names. The Dorset is a particular breed of Naga.
Actually, from my experience they're slightly different. The heat is about the same but the Naga's are usually much bigger with a fruitier flavor.
[QUOTE="ownage_denied"][QUOTE="pseudodog07"] How many rappers have made money saying "KILL DIE KILL!!!!", 100s...1000s? What Michael Richards said is a drop in the bucket compared to that horror in media. Also, I stated if people wouldn't let his critics speak, I would stand up for them too.pseudodog07
WTF does rappers saying "KILL DIE KILL" have to do with Michael Richards? I'll be waiting.
Four Things:
1.What he said WAS racist.
2.People SHOULDN'T stop watching Seinfeld because of it.
3.People DO have the right to speak out against him.
4.This thread is NOT about ****ing rappers.
Rappers have everything to do with what he said and the larger society we live in. Plus, when I made a thread condemning the "KILL DIE KILL, N THIS N THAT" rappers say all the time, I got MODERATED!
What rappers say doesn't excuse what Michael Richards said. I guess your implying that since most rappers are black and some say bad things, it's okay for Michael Richards to spew hate speech. If you don't see a difference between the two then we should just end this discussion and agree to disagree.
yeah i found that out just a while ago ive been doing a little digging around on forums and i downloaded the original story and it was JUST like it there is no way now i think that that could have actually happened... and i believe the authors name was thomas lera or somthing like that.
but i must say that the original author can write a good creepy story!
80bb1t1042
Now that you mention it, I think the author was Thomas Lera.
I first read the story a few days ago and the pictures they posted made me really think it was real.
After the story ended the way it did, I searched and searched for more but found Lera's story and I was pissed :lol:.
[QUOTE="ownage_denied"][QUOTE="Chutebox"] He **** up, yes. But he apologized for it immediately on national tv, and it was very awkward lol. Anywho, I think what people are talking about with black comedians is many, and I mean many base their whole act on making fun of white people or the difference between blacks and whites. But I see you're a little worked up about it.Chutebox
Whole act, hardly. They make fun of all races during their acts.
How is that any different? lol I'm not saying their racists, I don't know them to call them that. I'm just saying that's what others are talking about.
It different because the jokes during the acts we're talking about aren't remotely close to the hate speech Michael Richards spewed.
Log in to comment