[QUOTE="Corey_Barlog_SM"]One of the key features is the ability to load data from your old save file. Not possible for PS3 owners.tmntPunchout

Also, not possible for people who didn't own ME1. Thread fail.

Damn that was quick :lol:.

An Ontario Superior Court judge has ordered a Toronto man to continue paying child support even though a DNA test shows he is not the biological father of his ex-wife's twins.
In her ruling, Madam Justice Katherine van Rensburg decided that even though Pasqualino Cornelio did not father twins with Anciolina Cornelio, he must continue to pay child support because "he was the only father the twins knew during the course of the marriage."
Pasqualino began paying child support in 1998, after the couple separated.
In 2002, the two agreed to joint custody, when they also settled that he would continue to provide monetary support.
But after Anciolina asked for an increase in payments and a reduction in the time he spent with the children, Pasqualino demanded a DNA test.
When the results showed Pasqualino was not the father, he asked to be excused from paying child support and demanded he be reimbursed for tens of thousands of dollars that he had paid in the past.
He claimed that their 2002 agreement failed to disclose that Anciolina had an affair while they were married, calling it an act of fraud or misrepresentation.
But according to van Rensburg, it should not be a question of whether he is the biological parent, but rather whether he was considered a parent by definition.
"Cornelio denies knowledge of who the twins' biological father might be," van Rensburg said.
In the end, van Rensburg ruled in favour of Anciolina.

Link

I completely disagree with her decision and I think the man should be reimbursed.

Does anyone know the exchange rate between Australian to American dollars, because I don't think the amount from the link could possibly be right.

I will be very surprised if this woman isn't declared insane.

EDIT

I just researched it and even though the link says 1 million Australian dollars = 715 million American dollars, it's actually only 703,467 American dollars.

A woman has been charged with murder after allegedly setting her husband's genitals on fire because she thought he was having an affair.

Prosecutors told the Adelaide Magistrates Court on Monday that 44-year-old Rajini Narayan confessed to neighbors that she set her husband on fire on December 8, 2008, after she saw him hug another woman.

She was initially charged with endangering life and arson but the charges were upgraded to murder after her 47-year-old husband, Satish Narayan, died from his injuries last week.

Prosecutor Lucy Boord said Narayan told neighbors she was a "jealous wife" but she hadn't meant to kill him when she doused the sleeping man's genitals with an alcohol-based solvent and then set him on fire.

Boord quoted Narayan allegedly saying: "I just wanted to burn his penis so it belongs to me and no one else ... I didn't mean this to happen."

The husband jumped out of bed and knocked over the bottle of alcohol, causing the fire to spread and resulting in 1 million Australian dollars ($715 million) of damage to their town house and an adjacent property, the Adelaide Advertiser reported.

Narayan was remanded in custody for psychological assessment and will reappear in court Friday. She has been charged with murder, arson and three counts of endangering life, as the couple's three children were at home during the incident.

Link

I think this takes hell hath no fury like a woman scorned to a different level.

Thoughts

As you could see from this photo still, the guy on the ground was unarmed and his hand was tied behind his back and his was laying on his stomach. To shoot a gun, you need to take it out the holster, aim, and shoot, and that's what the cop was caught on tape doing. There were at least 5 other officers in the vicinity, the guy was unarmed, so the cop was in no danger and he shot him in the back.

You also have to remember it was on New Years, so who knows if the guy was intoxicated and couldn't follow orders right away and that's why lots of people had cameras and such because it was New Years. Also these police are BART police, that's like mall cops, so they hardly get any action. Also when police officers are trying to restrain and arrest people, they don't care who's watching, they just try to focus on the job.

The cop probably just got caught in the heated atmosphere, took advantage of the power of his badge, and took a life.

one_on_one

I agree with this post 100%.

To everyone saying the gun accidentally went off.

Have you ever fired a pistol? If so, do you do so regularly?

I do and I can tell you now that pistols do not go off like that. The only way it's goes off accidentally is if it falls on a hard surface and hits the right spot.

I guarantee you that the officer had his finger on the trigger.

[QUOTE="ownage_denied"]

Ever heard of justice? It'll never happen if people take your approach to it.

Man is murdered but police decided not to pursue the suspect because he has to live with the pain of what he did everyday :roll:.

I can see it now.

Tiefster

Before I type this I'm going to tell you I'm not being sarcastic.

So how long should they give him? A month, a year? Also, if they do this for the cop, will all criminals be given this amount of time to get themselves together?

[QUOTE="ownage_denied"]

[QUOTE="BlizzardBear"]First let me say this is just a bad situation for both sides that I believe was an accident. The cop accidentally took out his gun instead of his taser gun because supposedly another cop switched in the belt. I do believe the cop didnt mean to shoot him and he probably feels terrible. I hate seeing people get angry and protesting over an accident that caused harm although they are even dealing out more harm in their protesting. They need to understand it was an accident he was out for the guy just because he was black. I feel bad for the cop and the man and I feel bad for the sad people that protest because they have nothing better to do and like starting more drama than necessary . In addition, the man who was killed doesn't have a clean slate so maybe he did do something to trigger the trigger.BlizzardBear

Stop... please just stop. Do you know why those people were protesting? They were protesting because it has been a week since the shooting and the guy hasn't even been formally questioned yet. I love how you chose to single out the protesters who got out of hand. There were many more peaceful protesters.

Link to the cops belt getting switched?

What does having a clean slate have to do with anything. We don't even know if the cops were aware of this and even if they were, it doesn't give them the right to execute the man.

Facepalm at the "maybe he did something to trigger the trigger." He was face ****ing down.

What who was saying, the man who was executed? If so, all the eye witnesses are saying the same thing. The man said please don't taser me and then said please don't I have a four year old daughter. Also, even if he said the most terrible things to the officer, EXECUTION is not the answer. Especially when two of your fellow officers are all ready detaining the suspect with you.

The dumb protesters are ridiculous, but my point still stands. If the majority are being peaceful, you can't lump them altogether.

I hate to tell you this, but police have gotten away with brutality cases before.

[QUOTE="ownage_denied"]

[QUOTE="Tiefster"]These things happen, if we cry about every single one then the world becomes a worse place than it seems. The man was unarmed but worse attrocities happen on a much larger scale in other parts of the world.Tiefster

Wtf is this supposed to mean and who's crying :?? Are you saying people shouldn't be outraged when a helpless individual is executed by someone who is supposed to protect and serve the people?

Ever heard of justice? It'll never happen if people take your approach to it.

Man is murdered but police decided not to pursue the suspect because he has to live with the pain of what he did everyday :roll:.

I can see it now.